Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Arrival
Track the centreline through touchdown using small rudder corrections against a point at the far end of the runway.
What happened: The aircraft touched down off the centreline at 11 m, and drifting off centreline at touchdown usually carries through into the rollout, as it did here with alignment reaching 13 m.
Watch for: Watch runway centreline position, keeping deviation inside the limit through touchdown and rollout.
The rudder input is a changing profile through the roll rather than one that is held. So the demand on your right foot starts large at power application, eases as speed builds and the rudder gains authority, then jumps again at rotation.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 12 stages, 11 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,810 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,810 m of the 3,742 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 777 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport, the Airbus A320 began its takeoff roll on runway 31R. The aircraft accelerated down the 2,679-meter runway, covering 72% of its length, before lifting off at a speed of 153 knots. The local weather conditions were favorable, with a temperature of 20 degrees Celsius and a gentle wind of 3 knots from 227 degrees, resulting in a negligible crosswind component.
As the aircraft climbed away from the airport, it quickly gained altitude, rising from 1,615 feet above sea level to 2,713 feet in just one minute, covering a distance of three nautical miles. The enroute level cruise phase followed, during which the aircraft maintained a steady altitude of 2,713 feet for three minutes, covering a distance of 11 nautical miles. The descent phase began overhead Peteri, with the aircraft losing 876 feet of altitude in three minutes, covering a distance of seven nautical miles. The final approach to runway 31R was initiated from the south-east, with the aircraft descending to an altitude of 1,451 feet above ground level.
The Airbus A320 touched down on the runway at a speed of 124 knots, with a smooth touchdown rate of -109 feet per minute. The touchdown point was 359 meters beyond the touchdown zone, and the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned from the centerline by 10.6 meters. The total landing distance was 1,726 meters, covering 47% of the runway length. Following touchdown, the aircraft rolled out, with the runway rollout alignment slightly misaligned from the centerline by 12.0 meters. The total flight distance was 29 nautical miles, and the aircraft used 5,473 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The final approach to runway 31R at LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport was conducted from the south east, heading 312.0° at 4 nm and 1,451 ft agl. The approach quality was satisfactory, with a threshold height at 60 ft agl that was above the target. However, the threshold speed was good at 135 kt, indicating a well-executed approach.
The aircraft touched down 359 m beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 124 kt that was within the acceptable range. The touchdown rate was smooth at -109 fpm, demonstrating good control and stability during the landing phase. However, the runway touchdown position was misaligned by 10.6 m from the centreline, which may have contributed to the slightly misaligned runway rollout alignment of 12.0 m from centreline.
The total landing distance of 1,726 m was 47% of the runway length, indicating a relatively short landing distance. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 20 °C and a wind of 3 kt at 227°, were relatively calm, with a negligible crosswind and headwind. Overall, the landing performance was good, with a score of 89.3%, but there were some minor deviations from the ideal touchdown position and centreline alignment.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values