Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 4.5 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
A small uncorrected heading error at 40 knots becomes a metre of offset per second by 100 knots, noticed only at rotation, producing a crabbed liftoff. Root cause is nearly always eyes on the tape instead of the far end of the runway. Small heading changes displace a distant point visibly long before the nearby centreline stripes look wrong.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,891 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 267 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the Airbus A320 taxiing from the parking area to the runway at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, taking approximately 6 minutes and covering a distance of 2 nautical miles. The departure roll took place on runway 24, with a takeoff distance of 1,121 meters, which is 35% of the runway length. The aircraft lifted off at a speed of 159 knots.
As the aircraft took to the skies, it encountered local weather conditions of 20°C temperature and a wind speed of 18 knots at 220 degrees. The crosswind was 5 knots, while the headwind was 17 knots. The enroute climb began approximately 1 mile north of Aalsmeerderbrug, a town in the province of Noord-Holland, Netherlands. The aircraft climbed from an altitude of 1,018 feet above sea level to 35,258 feet above sea level, an increase of 34,240 feet, in 20 minutes and covering a distance of 101 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise started 2 miles northwest of Hattingen, a town in the state of Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany. This phase of the flight lasted for 32 minutes and covered a distance of 260 nautical miles. The enroute descent began overhead Gauting, a town in the state of Bavaria, Germany. The aircraft descended from an altitude of 35,359 feet above sea level to 3,613 feet above sea level, a decrease of 31,746 feet, in 10 minutes and covering a distance of 47 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 26 at Innsbruck Airport took place from the east, with the aircraft heading at 263.0 degrees at an altitude of 1,688 feet above ground level and a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway. The landing took place on runway 26, which has a length of 1,891 meters. The threshold height was good, but the threshold speed was slightly above the target at 148 knots. The touchdown distance was good at 265 meters, but the touchdown speed was a little fast at 144 knots. The touchdown rate was very hard at -500 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 4.2 meters from the centerline.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were 20°C temperature and a wind speed of 8 knots at 80 degrees. The crosswind was 0 knots, while the tailwind was 8 knots. The total landing distance was 888 meters, which is 47% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was very good. The taxiing to the parking area from the runway took approximately 3 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile.
The total flight distance was 416 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 75 minutes. The aircraft used 3,200 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed at Innsbruck Airport (LOWI) with a score of 95.8%. The aircraft approached the runway from the east, heading 263.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,688 feet above ground level (agl). The final approach was made to runway 26, which has a length of 1,891 meters.
Upon touchdown, the threshold height was reported as good, but the threshold speed was slightly above the target at 148 knots. The touchdown distance of 265 meters was considered good, indicating a smooth and controlled descent. However, the touchdown speed of 144 knots was a little fast, which may have contributed to the hard touchdown rate of -500 feet per minute (fpm). This high touchdown rate suggests that the aircraft may have touched down with a significant amount of energy, which could have put additional stress on the landing gear and potentially affected the overall safety of the landing.
The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 4.2 meters from the centerline, which may have been due to the crosswind or tailwind conditions. The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were characterized by a temperature of 20°C and a wind speed of 8 knots at 80°. The crosswind component was negligible at 0 knots, but the tailwind component was 8 knots, which may have contributed to the slightly misaligned touchdown.
The total landing distance of 888 meters was 47% of the runway length, which is a relatively short distance. This suggests that the aircraft was able to stop quickly and efficiently after touchdown. The runway rollout alignment was reported as very good, indicating that the aircraft was able to maintain a stable and controlled path after touchdown.
Overall, the landing was considered successful, but there were some areas for improvement, such as the slightly fast touchdown speed and the hard touchdown rate. However, the aircraft was able to stop quickly and efficiently, and the runway rollout alignment was very good.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values