Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Configure earlier
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: sink rate above what the glideslope needed, off the runway's 3° glideslope and speed above the reference speed.
At the 500 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,867 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 89 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 7 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The aircraft then departed from runway 27L at KORD Chicago O'Hare International Airport, with a takeoff distance of 671 meters, which was 20% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 132 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 8 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 11 knots coming from a direction of 289 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 4 knots and a headwind of 10 knots. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, starting 1 mile north of Bensenville, Illinois, and climbing from an altitude of 1,671 feet above sea level to 40,381 feet above sea level, an increase of 38,710 feet, in 18 minutes and covering a distance of 119 nautical miles.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, starting 3 miles southeast of KSTV Sturgis Airport in Sturgis, Indiana, and lasting 31 minutes, covering a distance of 302 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting 2 miles north of Deer Park, Maryland, and descending from an altitude of 40,767 feet above sea level to 1,866 feet above sea level, a decrease of 38,900 feet, in 17 minutes and covering a distance of 99 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, starting 2 miles southeast of VA66 Breeden Airport in Catlett, Virginia, and lasting 41 minutes, covering a distance of 19 nautical miles. The final approach to runway 01L at KIAD Washington Dulles International Airport was made from the south, with a heading of 2.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,570 feet above ground level.
The landing on runway 01L was successful, with a touchdown distance of 87 meters, which was good. However, the touchdown speed of 109 knots was slightly above the target speed, and the touchdown rate of -211 feet per minute was fair. The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 11.0 meters from the centerline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 8 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 6 knots coming from a direction of 140 degrees, resulting in a crosswind of 4 knots and a tailwind of 4 knots.
The total landing distance was 715 meters, which was 25% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 12.3 meters from the centerline. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 6 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 547 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 87 minutes. The aircraft used 1,217 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
Aircraft C750 successfully landed on runway 01L at KIAD Washington Dulles International Airport, achieving a score of 94.3%. The final approach was initiated from the south, heading 2.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,570 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft successfully touched down on the runway, with a touchdown distance of 87 meters, which was considered good.
However, there were a few areas for improvement. The threshold speed was slightly below the target speed of 111 knots, which may have been due to the aircraft's approach configuration or the pilot's decision to flare earlier than expected. Additionally, the touchdown speed of 109 knots was a little fast, which could have resulted in a longer rollout distance. The touchdown rate of -211 feet per minute (fpm) was fair, indicating that the aircraft was able to absorb the impact of touchdown relatively smoothly.
The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 11.0 meters from the centerline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the aircraft's approach path or a miscalculation of the runway alignment. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were relatively calm, with a temperature of 8°C and a wind speed of 6 knots from 140°. The crosswind and tailwind components were both 4 knots, which was relatively minimal.
The total landing distance of 715 meters was 25% of the runway length, indicating that the aircraft was able to stop relatively quickly after touchdown. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 12.3 meters from the centerline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the aircraft's rollout path or a miscalculation of the runway alignment. Overall, the landing was considered successful, but there were a few areas for improvement that the pilot and aircraft could work on to achieve an even higher score.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values