Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Ease the nose up sooner to lift off at 133 kt instead of letting speed build on the ground.
What happened: The aircraft lifted off at 161 kt, 28 kt above the target liftoff speed.
Watch for: Airspeed indicator: 133 kt at liftoff
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Apply steady, continuous back pressure through the flare to arrest the sink smoothly and hold the normal profile, rather than letting it drift.
What happened: The flare did not hold its target profile, with the sink most arrested at 1.1 ft, and this flight then touched down at 313 fpm of sink - a firm arrival. An unsettled flare profile like this usually carries through to a firmer touchdown.
Watch for: Vertical speed indicator: a smooth, steadily decreasing sink rate through the flare to touchdown.
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 in the score
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,828 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,828 m of the 3,001 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 541 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
This Boeing 777-200ER aircraft departed from Tokyo Haneda International Airport's runway 05, covering the first 3 nautical miles in 10 minutes while taxiing from the parking area to the runway. The aircraft took off from runway 05 with a takeoff distance of 1,379 meters, which is 55% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 161 knots under local conditions of 30°C temperature and wind of 5 knots at a direction of 90 degrees. The crosswind was 4 knots and the headwind was 3 knots, giving the aircraft a total crosswind component.
The enroute climb began approximately 2 miles east of Tokyo Haneda International Airport, with a rapid ascent from 1,027 feet above sea level to 29,420 feet above sea level, an increase of 28,393 feet, covered in just 7 minutes. This ascent also covered 60 nautical miles of distance.
Following the initial climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise. This phase started approximately 2 miles west of Heda in the Shizuoka Prefecture, and the aircraft maintained this flight level for 3 minutes. During this time, the aircraft traveled a distance of 62 nautical miles.
In preparation for landing, the aircraft began its descent. This phase started approximately 1 mile northwest of Toyokawa in the Aichi Prefecture, and the aircraft descended from 29,484 feet above sea level to 1,379 feet above sea level, a decrease of 28,106 feet, in 18 minutes. The descent covered a distance of 93 nautical miles.
Upon approaching RJOO Osaka International Airport, the aircraft was on a heading of 315.0 degrees, approximately 4 nautical miles from the point of intersection with the runway 32L. The aircraft was at an altitude of 1,324 feet above ground level and was approaching the runway from the southeast direction.
The aircraft landed on runway 32L at RJOO Osaka International Airport, which is 3,001 meters in length. However, the aircraft's touchdown point was 80 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, indicating that the aircraft landed short of the intended touchdown position. The touchdown speed was 121 knots, which is within the acceptable range, but the landing rate was very heavy at -742 feet per minute, which exceeds the standard touchdown criteria.
After landing, the aircraft rolled along the runway for a total distance of 1,702 meters, which accounts for 57% of the runway length. The runway touchdown position was 9.2 meters off the centerline, and the alignment during the rollout phase was slightly off by 9.0 meters.
After rolling to a stop, the aircraft took 5 minutes to taxi back to the parking area, a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. Throughout the entire flight, the aircraft maintained a total distance of 224 nautical miles and consumed 5,219 kilograms of fuel.
The landing of the Boeing 777-200ER aircraft at Osaka International Airport (RJOO) was evaluated with a score of 81.9%. The approach to runway 32L was initiated from the southeast, heading 315.0°, at a distance of 4 nautical miles (nm) from the airport and an altitude of 1,324 feet above ground level (agl).
The approach parameters showed that the aircraft's speed at threshold was within the desired limits, measuring 130 knots. However, there was a significant discrepancy between the actual threshold height and the target height, with the actual height being excessively above the target of 105 feet agl. Despite this, the touchdown point was 80 meters beyond the touchdown zone.
On the other hand, the touchdown speed of 121 knots was within the acceptable limits, indicating a smooth and steady descent. However, the touchdown rate of -742 feet per minute (fpm) was deemed to be excessively heavy, which may have put additional stress on the aircraft's landing gear.
In terms of runway alignment, the aircraft touched down 9.2 meters off the centerline, representing a slight misalignment. During the rollout, the aircraft's alignment with the centerline was also somewhat off, deviating by 9.0 meters. This may indicate a minor issue with the aircraft's directional control during the landing phase.
The local weather conditions during the landing were characterized by a temperature of 31°C and a gentle headwind of 3 knots. The wind direction was from the northwest, and the crosswind component was minimal at 1 knot. Overall, while the landing was not without its issues, the aircraft performed relatively well, achieving a score of 81.9% in this evaluation.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values