Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Ease the nose up sooner to lift off at 130 kt instead of letting speed build on the ground.
What happened: The aircraft lifted off at 144 kt, 14 kt above the target liftoff speed.
Watch for: Airspeed indicator: 130 kt at liftoff
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Apply less back pressure in the flare, easing it in more slowly instead of arresting the sink sharply at 19 ft.
What happened: The flare arrested the sink at 19 ft, ballooning the aircraft before 170 fpm of sink rate returned as it settled back toward the runway.
Watch for: Vertical speed indicator: hold a steady, continuous descent through the normal flare band.
See Arrival Landing
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 22 stages, 20 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
At the 500 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 5,000 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 5,000 ft of the 7,404 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 2,462 ft past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 2 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft, a Cessna CJ4 Citation, then departed from runway 17R at the Dallas Fort Worth International Airport (KDFW). The takeoff distance was 1,708 feet, which accounted for 13% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 144 knots.
As the aircraft climbed, it started its enroute climb overhead the Dallas Fort Worth International Airport, rising from 1,577 feet above sea level to 26,216 feet above sea level, an increase of 24,639 feet in 11 minutes and covering 46 nautical miles. The local weather conditions at the time were a temperature of 82°F and a wind speed of 12 knots at 190°, resulting in a 2-knot crosswind and a 12-knot headwind.
The enroute level cruise started 2 miles southwest of the Majors Airport (KGVT) in Greenville, Texas, and lasted for 72 minutes, covering 514 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent 2 miles northeast of the Myers-Smith Airport (TN67) in Estill Springs, Tennessee, descending from 26,013 feet above sea level to 9,528 feet above sea level, a decrease of 16,484 feet in 9 minutes and covering 48 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise, this time starting 3 miles east of Soddy-Daisy, Tennessee, and lasting for 3 minutes, covering 10 nautical miles. The enroute descent started 2 miles west of the TGP Station 555 Heliport (4TN1) in Collinwood, Tennessee, descending from 8,968 feet above sea level to 4,395 feet above sea level, a decrease of 4,574 feet in 3 minutes and covering 8 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise, starting 4 miles southeast of Flat Top Mountain, Tennessee, and lasting for 2 minutes, covering 5 nautical miles. The enroute descent started 2 miles east of Middle Valley, Tennessee, descending from 3,812 feet above sea level to 1,947 feet above sea level, a decrease of 1,866 feet in 2 minutes and covering 7 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 20 at the Chattanooga Metropolitan Airport (KCHA) was made from the north, heading 197.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,262 feet above ground level. The landing was made on runway 20, which had a length of 7,404 feet. The threshold height was good, but the threshold speed was too high at 112 knots.
The touchdown point was 1,059 feet beyond the touchdown zone, and the touchdown speed was 98 knots, which was a little fast. However, the touchdown rate was smooth at -130 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown alignment was perfect. The local weather conditions at the time were a temperature of 77°F.
The total landing distance was 3,874 feet, which accounted for 52% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was also perfect. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 1 minute and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 644 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 108 minutes. Notably, the aircraft used 0 pounds of fuel during the flight.
The Cessna CJ4 Citation successfully landed at KCHA Chattanooga Metropolitan Airport (Lovell Field) with a score of 91.2%. The aircraft approached the runway from the north, heading 197.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,262 feet above ground level (agl). The pilot executed a smooth final approach, aligning perfectly with the runway.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft landed 1,059 feet beyond the designated touchdown zone, which is a relatively long distance. However, the touchdown speed of 98 knots was a bit fast, indicating that the pilot may have been able to touch down earlier and with a lower speed. The touchdown rate of -130 feet per minute (fpm) was smooth, indicating a controlled descent.
The threshold speed was too high at 112 knots, which is above the recommended speed for a safe landing. This may have contributed to the slightly long touchdown distance. The local weather conditions were favorable, with a temperature of 77°F, which did not pose any significant challenges for the landing.
The total landing distance of 3,874 feet was 52% of the runway length, which is a relatively high percentage. This suggests that the pilot may have been able to use a shorter landing distance with a more optimal approach and touchdown speed. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, indicating that the pilot maintained control of the aircraft during the rollout phase.
Overall, while the landing was not perfect, the pilot demonstrated good control and smoothness during the approach and touchdown phases. With some adjustments to the approach and touchdown speed, the pilot may be able to achieve a higher score and a shorter landing distance in the future.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values