Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Know your rotation speed
A typical trainer rotates in the mid-50s of knots - a 172 at around 55 KIAS, climbing out at a Vy in the low 70s, though check your own POH rather than memorising Cessna's numbers - and the transferable rule is that Vr sits just above the stall speed in takeoff configuration. Rotate early because "it felt ready" and the aircraft lifts off inside ground effect, where induced drag is reduced, then climbs out of it into more drag. On a marginal-performance day the result is an aircraft that lifts off and then refuses to climb, sagging back towards the runway.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,831 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 361 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight in the Vision Jet began with a 3-minute taxi from the parking area to the runway at KHXD Hilton Head. The departure roll on runway 21 covered 685 meters, which was 52% of the total runway length. The liftoff speed was recorded at 102 knots. The local weather at the time of departure indicated a temperature of 23°C with a wind of 8 knots coming from 290°, resulting in a crosswind of 7 knots and a headwind of 1 knot.
Upon reaching an altitude of 1,021 feet above sea level, the enroute climb began 1 mile east of Hilton Head Island. The climb took the aircraft to a peak altitude of 13,353 feet, marking an increase of 12,332 feet over 9 minutes and covering a distance of 32 nautical miles. The level cruise phase commenced 6 miles southwest of SC51 Too Goo Doo Farms Meggett and lasted for 9 minutes, covering 41 nautical miles.
As the journey progressed, the descent phase was initiated 10 miles west of 2SC7 Laurel Hill Farms Mcclellanville. The aircraft descended from 13,357 feet to 1,811 feet, a total decrease of 11,546 feet over a 12-minute period and covering a distance of 57 nautical miles. The landing was executed on runway 05 at KCRE Grand Strand, which had a length of 1,831 meters. The aircraft approached the threshold at a height of 34 feet above ground level, with a speed of 110 knots. The touchdown occurred 360 meters from the threshold at a speed of 101 knots, with a vertical speed indicator reading of -160 ft/min. The local weather conditions at the time of landing showed a temperature of 25°C, with a 5-knot wind coming from 280°, resulting in a crosswind of 4 knots and a tailwind of 3 knots. The total landing distance covered was 885 meters, accounting for 48% of the runway length.
The flight concluded with a 2-minute taxi from the runway to the parking area, covering less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance traveled was 141 nautical miles, with a total duration of 49 minutes. The aircraft consumed 136 kilograms of fuel during the course of the flight.
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 95.3% indicates a strong performance, with several areas of excellence and some areas in need of improvement.
Throughout the Approach Phase, the descent path above the glideslope limit and the speed well above target were areas of concern. Maintaining proper descent path and speed are crucial for a safe and smooth landing. It is important to closely monitor these parameters and make adjustments as needed to stay within the prescribed limits.
During the Landing Phase, it is commendable that the threshold height was good and the landing flare was perfect. These are important factors in ensuring a controlled and precise landing. However, the touchdown speed was too high and the touchdown distance inside the touchdown zone was slightly off, with the runway touchdown position 2.1 meters from the centerline. These issues could potentially lead to a harder landing and may require adjustments to improve accuracy and safety.
It is particularly concerning that the aircraft landed with a 3 knot tailwind, as this can have a significant impact on the aircraft's performance and safety during landing. It is crucial to always land into the wind whenever possible to ensure optimal control and safety.
In the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was deemed very good, which is a positive aspect of the landing. Proper alignment on the runway helps to ensure a smooth and efficient rollout, minimizing the risk of veering off course.
Overall, while the landing score was high at 95.3%, there are areas that require improvement to enhance safety and precision during future landings. It is important to address issues such as descent path, speed control, touchdown accuracy, tailwind landings, and alignment to consistently achieve high-quality landings. By focusing on these areas and making adjustments as needed, you can continue to improve your landing performance and ensure the safety of all on board. Keep up the good work and continue to strive for excellence in all phases of flight.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values