Track every flight, analyse your performance,
and master your flying skills with My FS Flights
Get 10 flights free every month!
Tracked and analysed flights over miles
The flight began with a departure roll from runway 27 at Miami International Airport (KMIA). The Cessna-140 RA aircraft accelerated down the runway, covering a distance of 46 meters, which accounted for just 1% of the total runway length. The aircraft lifted off the ground at a speed of 41 knots, marking the start of its journey.
As the aircraft took to the skies, it entered a level cruise phase, which lasted for 2 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. This brief period of steady flight allowed the aircraft to reach a stable altitude, before it began its descent back to the airport.
Upon approaching the airport, the aircraft prepared for landing on runway 27, which had a length of 3,449 meters. However, the landing was not without its challenges. The threshold height at 113 feet above ground level was excessively high, and the threshold speed was also higher than expected at 56 knots. Despite these issues, the aircraft touched down safely at a speed of 37 knots, with a smooth touchdown rate of -125 feet per minute.
The touchdown point was located 214 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, and the runway touchdown position was excessively misaligned by 127.3 meters from the centerline. The total landing distance covered by the aircraft was 787 meters, which accounted for 23% of the runway length. Furthermore, the runway rollout alignment was also excessively misaligned by 133.1 meters from the centerline.
After a successful landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, covering a distance of less than 1 nautical mile in just 1 minute. The total flight distance was a mere 1 nautical mile, and the aircraft used a total of -28 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
Replay this flight in 3D — the full flight path over the terrain with every stage, event and score along the route.
Entering runway 27 at KMIA Miami International Airport, Average speed was 25 kt.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| Info |
Average speed 29 kt 0 kt min to max 40 kt |
0 | 40 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 7.6 ° 5.4 ° min to max 11.4 ° |
11.2 | 6.0 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.1 ° 0.0 ° min to max 0.7 ° |
0.0 | 0.0 ° | |
| Info |
Average g force 0.98 g 0.96 g min to max 0.99 g |
0.98 | 0.98 g | |
| Info |
Battery Master On at 18:37:59 |
|||
| Info |
Engine 1 Started at 18:37:59 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Lights Switched On at 18:37:59 |
|||
| Info |
Navigation Lights Switched On at 18:37:59 |
|||
| Info |
Strobe Lights Switched On at 18:37:59 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Gear Down at 18:37:59 |
|||
| Info |
Parking Brake On at 18:37:59 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 1 at 18:37:59 |
|||
| Info |
Parking Brake Off at 18:42:31 |
Departure roll runway 27 at KMIA Miami International Airport. Takeoff distance 46 m 1 % of runway. Liftoff speed was 41 kt. Local weather - Temperature 15 °C. Wind 1 kt at 270 °. Crosswind: 0 kt Headwind: 1 kt.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Takeoff distance 46 m 1 % of runway |
|||
| 58.1 % |
Liftoff speed was 41 kt Target 31 kt |
|||
| 90.98 % |
Runway alignment max 5.52 m 5.52 m left to 0.00 m left |
2.98 | 5.52 m | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.01 g 0.97 g min to max 1.13 g |
0.98 | 1.13 g | |
| 100 % |
Takeoff Bounce |
|||
| Info |
Average pitch angle 6.1 ° 5.2 ° min to max 8.8 ° |
5.9 | 8.8 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.1 ° 0.0 ° min to max 0.1 ° |
0.0 | 0.1 ° |
Departure climb to 50 ft agl from runway 27 KMIA Miami International Airport.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 94 % |
Heading variation -1.3 ° -1.5 ° min to max -0.9 ° |
-0.9 | -1.5 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 44 kt 42 kt min to max 46 kt |
42 | 44 kt | |
| 96.53 % |
Average bank angle 0.8 ° 0.0 ° min to max 3.3 ° |
0.1 | 3.3 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.02 g 0.86 g min to max 1.16 g |
1.14 | 1.02 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI 423 fpm 327 fpm min to max 557 fpm |
348 | 528 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 23 ft agl 1 ft agl min to max 49 ft agl |
1 | 49 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 10.5 ° 8.6 ° min to max 12.8 ° |
9.2 | 12.0 ° | |
| Info |
Flaps Position 3 at 18:42:56 |
Departure climb to 400 ft agl from 27 KMIA Miami International Airport.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 83.62 % |
Heading variation -1.3 ° -3.3 ° min to max -0.4 ° |
-1.5 | -3.3 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 43 kt 38 kt min to max 51 kt |
44 | 49 kt | |
| 80.68 % |
Average bank angle 1.8 ° 0.0 ° min to max 9.3 ° |
3.3 | 9.3 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 0.99 g 0.64 g min to max 1.23 g |
1.02 | 1.00 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI 501 fpm -527 fpm min to max 656 fpm |
529 | 304 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 104 ft agl 49 ft agl min to max 255 ft agl |
49 | 255 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 11.9 ° -2.7 ° min to max 14.8 ° |
12.1 | 7.5 ° |
Enroute level cruise started overhead KMIA Miami International Airport Miami (Florida, United States) and lasted 2 minutes, covering less than 1 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average altitude 404 ft asl 123 ft asl min to max 536 ft asl |
275 | 123 ft asl | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 52 kt 39 kt min to max 61 kt |
49 | 58 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 11.7 ° 0.1 ° min to max 31.5 ° |
11.7 | 14.1 ° | |
| 96.86 % |
Average g force 1.02 g 0.64 g min to max 1.61 g |
1.00 | 1.31 g | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 3.6 ° -17.4 ° min to max 15.7 ° |
7.4 | 5.5 ° |
Landing on runway 27 at KMIA Miami International Airport, runway length 3,449 m. Threshold height at 113 ft agl was excessively over target. Threshold speed was excessively high at 56 kt.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 60.36 % |
Threshold speed was excessively high at 56 kt. Target 41 kt |
|||
| 0 % |
Target 50 ft agl |
|||
| 0 % |
Landing and flare profile |
|||
| 4.4 % |
Heading variation 2.0 ° 0.7 ° min to max 2.9 ° |
0.7 | 2.9 ° | |
| 79.3 % |
Average bank angle 1.2 ° 0.0 ° min to max 9.9 ° |
9.9 | 1.0 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.01 g 0.81 g min to max 1.30 g |
0.86 | 1.00 g | |
| Info |
Average speed 46 kt 37 kt min to max 56 kt |
56 | 37 kt | |
| Info |
Average VSI -263 fpm -496 fpm min to max -66 fpm |
-70 | -125 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 46 ft agl 3 ft agl min to max 113 ft agl |
113 | 3 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 3.0 ° -2.0 ° min to max 6.2 ° |
1.7 | 6.2 ° |
Touchdown point was 214 m beyond the touchdown zone. Touchdown speed at 37 kt was good. Touchdown rate was smooth at -125 fpm. Runway touchdown position was excessively misaligned by 127.3 m from centreline. Local weather - Temperature 15 °C. Wind 1 kt at 270 °. Crosswind: 0 kt Headwind: 1 kt.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 99.12 % |
Touchdown VSI was -125 fpm. |
|||
| 82.17 % |
Touchdown distance was 620 m Target 457 m |
|||
| 100 % |
Speed at touchdown 37 kt Target below 40 kt |
|||
| 0 % |
Runway alignment max 127.25 m 125.13 m left |
122.97 | 127.25 m | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 0.4 ° 0.0 ° min to max 1.0 ° |
1.0 | 0.2 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.02 g 0.91 g min to max 1.15 g |
1.00 | 1.06 g | |
| 40 % |
Landing Bounce |
|||
| Info |
Average speed 36 kt 34 kt min to max 37 kt |
37 | 34 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 8.0 ° 6.1 ° min to max 9.7 ° |
6.2 | 8.5 ° |
Total landing distance 787 m, 23 % of runway. Runway rollout alignment was excessively misaligned by 133.1 m from centreline.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Landing distance 787 m 23 % of runway. |
|||
| 0 % |
Runway alignment max 133.07 m 133.07 m left to 0.00 m left |
127.39 | 133.07 m | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.98 g min to max 1.05 g |
1.05 | 0.99 g | |
| Info |
Average speed 36 kt 31 kt min to max 38 kt |
38 | 31 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 8.4 ° 7.7 ° min to max 9.5 ° |
9.1 | 9.5 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.2 ° 0.0 ° min to max 0.4 ° |
0.2 | 0.1 ° |
Exiting runway, average speed 22 kt
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| Info |
Average speed 27 kt 25 kt min to max 30 kt |
30 | 25 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 11.0 ° 10.3 ° min to max 11.3 ° |
10.3 | 11.3 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.3 ° 0.0 ° min to max 0.5 ° |
0.0 | 0.5 ° | |
| Info |
Average g force 0.99 g 0.99 g min to max 1.00 g |
0.99 | 1.00 g |
Taxiing to the parking from the runway took 1 minutes and covered less than 1 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average speed 12 kt 5 kt min to max 24 kt |
24 | 5 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average speed turning corners 8 kt max 16 kt |
0 | 0 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 0.99 g 0.98 g min to max 1.00 g |
0.99 | 0.98 g | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 11.2 ° 10.9 ° min to max 11.6 ° |
11.2 | 11.5 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.4 ° 0.0 ° min to max 1.1 ° |
0.7 | 0.3 ° | |
| 100 % |
Landing Lights at 18:46:29 |
The Cessna-140 RA aircraft successfully landed on runway 27 at Miami International Airport (KMIA), but the landing was not without its issues. The aircraft scored a 48.1% on its landing, indicating room for improvement. One of the main concerns was the excessive height of the threshold at 113 ft above ground level (agl), which was significantly above the target height.
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down at a speed of 37 kt, which was within the acceptable range. However, the touchdown point was 214 m beyond the designated touchdown zone, indicating that the pilot may have been a bit too aggressive with the landing. The touchdown rate was smooth at -125 fpm, which is a good indicator of the pilot's control and ability to manage the aircraft's descent.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were relatively calm, with a temperature of 15 °C and a wind speed of 1 kt from 270°. This meant that there was essentially no crosswind or headwind to contend with, making the landing conditions relatively straightforward. However, the pilot still struggled to maintain alignment with the runway centerline, both during the touchdown and the rollout phases of the landing.
The runway touchdown position was excessively misaligned by 127.3 m from the centerline, and the runway rollout alignment was even more off by 133.1 m. This suggests that the pilot may have been experiencing some difficulty with controlling the aircraft's direction and maintaining a stable approach path. Despite these issues, the total landing distance of 787 m was only 23% of the available runway length, indicating that the pilot was able to bring the aircraft to a stop relatively quickly.
Overall, while the Cessna-140 RA aircraft was able to land safely, the pilot's performance was not without its flaws. With some additional practice and attention to detail, it's likely that the pilot can improve their skills and achieve a more successful landing.
Drag to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values
