Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 21 stages, 20 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,830 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,830 m of the 2,395 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 645 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, achieving an aircraft landing score of 81.0% is a commendable accomplishment, despite some areas that could use improvement. Let's break down the different phases of the landing and provide some analysis and encouragement for each:
Approach Phase: During the Approach Phase, the descent path was above the glideslope limit, indicating that the aircraft was not following the optimal vertical path towards the runway. This could potentially be improved by ensuring better adherence to the glideslope in future landings.
Landing Phase: In the Landing Phase, the threshold height was significantly above the target, suggesting a need for better alignment and coordination during the final approach. Additionally, the landing flare was deemed very poor, indicating a lack of smoothness and control during the touchdown. Utilizing proper techniques and practicing the landing flare can help improve this aspect of the landing performance.
Touchdown Phase: The touchdown rate was good, and the speed was on target, which are positive aspects of the landing. However, the touchdown point being 197 m beyond the touchdown zone and the runway touchdown position being 2.1 m from the centreline indicate a need for better precision and alignment during the touchdown phase. Practicing touchdown accuracy and focusing on maintaining alignment can help improve these areas in future landings.
Rollout Phase: During the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was 17.8 m from the centreline, suggesting some difficulty in maintaining a straight path after touchdown. Working on maintaining runway alignment and utilizing proper control inputs can help improve this aspect of the landing performance.
In conclusion, while there are areas for improvement identified in the different phases of the landing, achieving an 81.0% aircraft landing score showcases a strong foundation. By focusing on practicing specific techniques, such as maintaining alignment, improving the landing flare, and adhering to the glideslope, you can continue to enhance your landing skills and strive for even higher scores in future landings. Keep up the hard work and dedication to improvement, and your landing performance will undoubtedly continue to progress positively.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values