Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Hold the approach angle
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 18 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 152 m above the runway. The 305 m gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,598 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 225 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Let's break down the performance of the aircraft landing in each phase and see where improvements can be made to achieve a higher score next time.
During the Approach Phase, the descent path was above the glideslope limit, indicating that the aircraft was coming in too steeply. This can be corrected by monitoring the vertical descent rate more closely and making adjustments to stay on the correct glide path. Additionally, the speed being slightly above target suggests the need for better speed management during the descent.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it's great to see that the threshold height was good, indicating a proper alignment with the runway upon approach. The landing flare was fair, but there is room for improvement in achieving a smoother touchdown by adjusting the flare technique.
In the Touchdown Phase, the touchdown rate was noted as very hard, which can put strain on the aircraft's landing gear and may lead to discomfort for passengers. It's important to aim for a softer touchdown by reducing the rate of descent and gently flaring the aircraft just before touchdown. Keeping the speed closer to target will also help in achieving a smoother landing.
It's positive to note that the aircraft touched down within the touchdown zone, but the distance inside the zone was mentioned, indicating a need for more precise positioning. Additionally, being slightly off the runway centreline during touchdown suggests the need for better alignment with the runway.
Lastly, during the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was off by 4.6 meters from the centreline. This can be improved by making small corrections to maintain a straight path down the runway during the rollout.
Overall, while the aircraft landing score was 89.5%, there are specific areas in each phase that can be addressed for a more successful landing next time. Remember to focus on maintaining the correct glide path, managing speed effectively, improving flare technique, aiming for a softer touchdown, and ensuring precise alignment with the runway. With practice and attention to detail, you can continue to improve your landing performance and achieve even higher scores in the future. Keep up the good work and continue striving for excellence in your aircraft landings!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values