Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,285 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 346 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 9 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. The aircraft, an Airbus A321, then departed from runway 34 at Wellington International Airport (NZWN). The takeoff distance was 1,181 meters, which was 65% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 148 knots, and the local weather conditions were characterized by a temperature of 16°C, a wind speed of 5 knots at 40°, with a crosswind of 3 knots and a headwind of 4 knots.
As the aircraft climbed to its cruising altitude, it passed overhead SB14 Wellington, where the enroute climb began. The aircraft climbed from 1,001 feet above sea level to 27,643 feet above sea level, an increase of 26,641 feet, in 16 minutes and covering a distance of 101 nautical miles. The enroute level cruise started 12 miles north-east of Waverley, Taranaki, and lasted for 9 minutes, covering a distance of 71 nautical miles.
The enroute descent started 10 miles west of Piopio, Waikato, and the aircraft descended from 27,021 feet above sea level to 2,720 feet above sea level, a decrease of 24,301 feet, in 14 minutes and covering a distance of 74 nautical miles. The enroute level cruise started again 7 miles north-west of Waiuku, Auckland, and lasted for 6 minutes, covering a distance of 10 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 05R at Auckland International Airport (NZAA) was made from the south-west, heading 71.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,275 feet above ground level. The landing on runway 05R was successful, with a touchdown distance of 349 meters, which was 35% of the runway length. The touchdown speed was 146 knots, which was a little fast, and the touchdown rate was hard at -487 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, and the runway rollout alignment was perfect.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 19°C, a wind speed of 5 knots at 40°, with a crosswind of 3 knots and a headwind of 4 knots. The total landing distance was 1,147 meters, and the total flight distance was 263 nautical miles, taking 59 minutes and using 2,856 kilograms of fuel. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 7 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile.
The Airbus A321 aircraft successfully landed at Auckland International Airport, achieving a high score of 97.2%. The final approach to runway 05R was conducted from the southwest, aligning with a heading of 71.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,275 feet above ground level.
The aircraft touched down on the runway with a good threshold height, indicating a precise and controlled descent. The threshold speed of 147 knots was also satisfactory, demonstrating the pilot's ability to manage the aircraft's speed during the landing phase. However, the touchdown speed of 146 knots was slightly above the optimal range, which may have contributed to a harder touchdown rate.
The touchdown rate of -487 feet per minute was considered hard, suggesting that the aircraft may have touched down with a bit too much force. Nevertheless, the runway touchdown alignment was very good, indicating that the pilot maintained a stable and controlled approach.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were favorable, with a temperature of 19°C and a gentle wind of 5 knots from a direction of 40°. The crosswind component was minimal at 3 knots, while the headwind component was 4 knots, which helped to stabilize the aircraft during the landing phase.
The total landing distance of 1,147 meters was 35% of the runway length, which is a relatively short distance considering the aircraft's size and weight. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, indicating that the pilot maintained a stable and controlled rollout after touchdown.
Overall, the landing was successful, and the pilot demonstrated a high level of skill and proficiency in managing the aircraft during the final approach and landing phase. However, there is room for improvement in terms of touchdown speed and touchdown rate to achieve an even smoother and more controlled landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values