Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 14 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Reduce power earlier on approach to be at 119 kt by the stabilisation gate, not just by the threshold.
What happened: The approach was too fast at the stabilisation gate, crossing the threshold at 124 kt against a VREF of 119 kt.
Watch for: Airspeed indicator against 119 kt at the stabilisation gate.
See Arrival Approach
A crosswind landing is a geometry problem. The air mass you're flying in is moving sideways across the runway, and you need your ground track down the centreline with your wheels aligned to it at the moment of contact. There are two techniques that will help, the crab and the sideslip.
Read more in Crosswind Landings in the SimStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed 39 kt FAST on the reference speed of 119 kt.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,526 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,526 m of the 3,289 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 544 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Warsaw Chopin Airport, the aircraft began its journey by taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 8 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. As it reached the runway, it initiated its departure roll on runway 29, accelerating to a liftoff speed of 150 knots. The takeoff distance of 1,041 meters was 45% of the runway length, and the aircraft lifted off into the local weather conditions, which featured a temperature of 14°C and a wind of 20 knots at 280°.
As the aircraft climbed away from Warsaw, it began its enroute climb 1 mile west of Wlochy, rising from an initial altitude of 1,370 feet above sea level to a cruising altitude of 35,994 feet, an increase of 34,624 feet in just 11 minutes. The climb covered a distance of 94 nautical miles, and the aircraft then entered a level cruise phase, lasting 18 minutes and covering 154 nautical miles, 2 miles west of Bobrowo. The enroute descent phase began 25 miles southeast of Bodilsker Airstrip Nexo, Denmark, where the aircraft descended from 36,004 feet to 4,946 feet in 16 minutes, covering 102 nautical miles. The aircraft then entered a series of short level cruise phases, before beginning its final approach to runway 22L at Copenhagen Kastrup Airport.
The final approach was initiated from the north-east, heading 221.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,349 feet above ground level. The aircraft landed on the 3,299-meter runway, with a touchdown point 129 meters beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed of 112 knots was slightly fast, but the touchdown rate of -267 feet per minute was fair. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, and the aircraft taxied to the parking area, a process that took 6 minutes and covered 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 394 nautical miles, taking 70 minutes, and the aircraft used 1,042 kilograms of fuel.
The aircraft, C750, successfully executed a final approach to runway 22L at EKCH Copenhagen Kastrup Airport from the north east, aligning with the heading of 221.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,349 feet above ground level. The approach quality was satisfactory, with a good threshold height and a threshold speed of 124 kt, indicating a well-controlled descent.
As the aircraft touched down on the runway, the touchdown point was located 129 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 112 kt, which was slightly above the optimal range. The touchdown rate of -267 feet per minute was fair, indicating a controlled deceleration. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, with the aircraft centered on the runway. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 14°C and a wind speed of 16 kt from 320°, resulted in a moderate crosswind component of 16 kt and a negligible tailwind of 2 kt.
The total landing distance of 1,446 meters, accounting for 44% of the runway length, was within acceptable limits. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 11.7 meters from the centerline, indicating a minor deviation from the desired path. Despite this, the overall performance of the aircraft earned a score of 94.8%, reflecting a high level of proficiency in executing a safe and controlled landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values