Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 17 ft off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Fly the flare as one continuous check of the sink rate from 23 ft, holding back pressure steadily rather than adjusting pitch piecemeal.
What happened: The flare drifted away from its intended profile rather than tracking it smoothly from 23 ft down to touchdown.
Watch for: Watch radio altitude and VSI through the flare, aiming to arrest the sink smoothly from 23 ft to touchdown.
See Arrival Landing
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 21 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: off the centreline.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 5,000 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 5,000 ft of the 8,169 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 2,650 ft past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 181 minutes and covered a distance of 27 nautical miles. The aircraft, an Airbus A320, departed from runway 24R at RJBB Kansai International Airport in Osaka, Japan. The takeoff distance was 6,302 feet, which accounted for 48% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 165 knots, and the local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 87°F and a wind speed of 27 knots at 225°.
As the aircraft climbed away from the airport, it began its enroute climb, which started 1 mile west of RJBB Kansai International Airport. The climb took 22 minutes and covered a distance of 147 nautical miles, during which the aircraft ascended from 1,053 feet above sea level to 36,149 feet above sea level, an increase of 35,096 feet. The enroute level cruise started 1 mile northwest of Sagara, Japan, and lasted for 2 minutes, covering a distance of 14 nautical miles.
The aircraft then began its enroute descent, which started 11 miles southeast of RJNY JASDF Shizuhama Air Base Yaizu, Japan. The descent took 9 minutes and covered a distance of 61 nautical miles, during which the aircraft descended from 35,661 feet above sea level to 13,570 feet above sea level, a decrease of 22,091 feet. The enroute level cruise started 6 miles southwest of RJTE JMSDF Tateyama Air Base Tateyama, Japan, and lasted for 8 minutes, covering a distance of 38 nautical miles.
The aircraft then began another enroute descent, which started 7 miles east of Katsuura, Japan. The descent took 10 minutes and covered a distance of 41 nautical miles, during which the aircraft descended from 13,587 feet above sea level to 1,659 feet above sea level, a decrease of 11,928 feet. The enroute level cruise started 3 miles southeast of Urayasu, Japan, and lasted for 2 minutes, covering a distance of 5 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 23 at RJTT Tokyo Haneda International Airport was made from the northeast, heading 215.0° at 3 nautical miles and 1,256 feet above ground level. The landing was made on runway 23, which had a length of 8,169 feet. The threshold height at 62 feet above ground level was above the target, and the threshold speed was well above the target at 151 knots.
The touchdown point was 1,265 feet beyond the touchdown zone, and the touchdown speed was 135 knots, which was a little fast. However, the touchdown rate was smooth at -109 feet per minute. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 21 feet from the centerline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 83°F and a wind speed of 28 knots at 201°.
The total landing distance was 4,345 feet, which accounted for 53% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was very good. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 6 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 340 nautical miles, and the flight took 71 minutes, using 6,529 pounds of fuel.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed at Tokyo Haneda International Airport's runway 23, achieving a score of 89.1%. The aircraft approached the runway from the north east, heading 215.0° at a distance of 3 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,256 feet above ground level (agl).
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down 1,265 feet beyond the designated touchdown zone, which is slightly outside the target area. The touchdown speed of 135 knots was a bit faster than the target speed, indicating that the pilots may have needed to apply more braking force to slow down the aircraft. However, the touchdown rate was smooth at -109 feet per minute (fpm), suggesting that the pilots maintained control of the aircraft during the landing.
The threshold height at 62 feet agl was above the target, and the threshold speed was well above the target at 151 knots. This indicates that the pilots may have been a bit too aggressive during the approach, but they were able to recover and maintain control of the aircraft.
The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 21 feet from the centerline, which may have been due to the crosswind or headwind conditions. The local weather conditions were characterized by a temperature of 83°F and a wind speed of 28 knots at 201°. The crosswind component was 10 knots, while the headwind component was 27 knots.
The total landing distance was 4,345 feet, which is 53% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating that the pilots were able to maintain control of the aircraft and apply the correct amount of braking force. The runway rollout alignment was very good, suggesting that the pilots were able to maintain control of the aircraft during the rollout phase.
Overall, the landing was successful, but there were some areas for improvement, such as maintaining a more accurate approach speed and touchdown position. However, the pilots were able to recover and maintain control of the aircraft, resulting in a smooth and safe landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values