Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Shorten the long landing
Ground effect becomes significant below about one wingspan of height. A Cessna 172, with a 36 ft span, enters ground effect at flare height - the float it feels in the hold-off is ground effect arriving on cue. An A320, with a span around 117 ft, has been in ground effect since before the threshold and there is no sudden cushion to feel, only a gradual reduction in induced drag that lengthens any float you allow.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 5,000 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 5,000 ft of the 10,480 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 445 ft touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
First and foremost, I want to commend you on successfully bringing the aircraft to the ground despite facing various challenges during the landing. It's clear that there were some areas for improvement, but let's focus on what went well and how we can work towards better scores in the future.
During the Approach Phase, it's important to maintain a descent path within the glideslope limits and to adjust speed accordingly. While the descent path was above the limit and the speed was slightly below target, it's essential to review the approach procedures and work on smoother adjustments to ensure a more accurate descent path and speed control.
In the Landing Phase, we observed that the threshold height was above target and the landing flare was poor. Additionally, there were issues with bank angle stability during landing. To improve in these areas, practice smooth flare techniques and focus on maintaining a stable bank angle throughout the landing process. This will help in achieving a smoother touchdown and a more stable approach to the runway.
In the Touchdown Phase, the touchdown rate was very heavy, and the speed was slightly above target. The touchdown distance inside the touchdown zone was positive, but the runway touchdown position was 129 feet from the centerline. Bouncing on touchdown is also a factor that should be addressed. To work on this, focus on reducing the touchdown rate by gradually decreasing speed and ensuring a smooth transition onto the runway. Additionally, aim for a more centered touchdown position to improve overall landing performance.
Overall, while the score may not have been as high as desired, there are clear areas for improvement that we can work on together. By incorporating these suggestions into your practice and reviewing landing procedures, I have no doubt that you will see positive results in your future landings. Keep up the hard work and dedication to improving your skills, and I am confident that your scores will continue to rise with each flight. Great job on your landing, and keep striving for excellence in all aspects of your flying.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values