Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Hold the approach speed
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 17 stages, 15 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 152 m above the runway. The 305 m gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,437 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 375 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, a landing score of 86.7% is a solid result, indicating that there were many strong elements in the approach and landing phases of the aircraft.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it is commendable that the glideslope alignment was excellent. This suggests that the descent angle of the aircraft was well-controlled, leading to a smooth approach towards the runway. However, there was room for improvement in the heading alignment, as it was reported as poor. This could be an area to focus on in future flights to ensure that the aircraft is properly aligned with the runway throughout the approach phase.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is great to see that the threshold height was good and the landing flare was very good. These are crucial elements for a successful landing, indicating that the pilot was able to make a smooth transition from descent to touchdown. However, there were some areas that could be worked on, such as the poor landing heading and bank angle stability. These factors can affect the overall stability and control of the aircraft during landing and could be improved upon with practice and attention to detail.
In the Touchdown Phase, the touchdown rate was reported as excellent, indicating a smooth and controlled landing. It is also positive to see that the speed was on target and the touchdown distance was inside the touchdown zone. The runway touchdown position being 5.0 meters from the centerline is a good result, showing precision in the landing.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being 7.0 meters from the centerline may indicate some room for improvement in maintaining the aircraft's alignment with the runway during the landing roll. This could be an area to focus on to further improve the overall landing performance.
Overall, while there were some areas that could be improved upon, the aircraft landing score of 86.7% is a solid result. By continuing to focus on areas of weakness and building upon the strengths displayed in the approach and landing phases, further improvements can be made to achieve even higher scores in future landings. Keep up the good work and continue to practice and refine your landing skills. Happy flying!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values