Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the rollout
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,594 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 331 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight in the Boeing 737-MAX8 started with a taxi from the parking area to the runway at ENBO Bodø Airport, which took 11 minutes to cover 3 nautical miles. The departure roll occurred on runway 07, with a takeoff distance of 1,708 meters, representing 61% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 175 knots. The local weather at the time of departure was 18°C with a wind speed of 1 knot coming from 269°, resulting in a negligible crosswind and a tailwind of 1 knot.
Once enroute, the climb began overhead Bodo in Nordland Fylke, Norway, starting at an altitude of 1,065 feet above sea level and reaching 37,454 feet, covering 136 nautical miles in 14 minutes. The subsequent level cruise phase commenced 12 miles east of Terrak and lasted 14 minutes, covering 170 nautical miles.
The descent phase started 7 miles southeast of Tolga in Innlandet, Norway, descending from 37,999 feet to 11,003 feet and covering 92 nautical miles in 14 minutes. Another brief cruise segment followed, beginning 3 miles west of Hamar and lasting 2 minutes, covering 9 nautical miles.
The final descent phase started overhead Reinsvoll, descending from 11,000 feet to 1,962 feet over 9 minutes and covering 28 nautical miles. The final approach to runway 19R at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen was from the north at a heading of 196.0°, 4 nautical miles from the runway threshold and at an altitude of 1,278 feet above ground level.
The landing on runway 19R at ENGM Oslo Airport was successful, with a touchdown distance of 334 meters and a speed of 142 knots, slightly faster than target. However, the touchdown rate was very hard at -522 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.8 meters from the centerline. The total landing distance was 1,288 meters, representing 36% of the runway length, and the runway rollout alignment was misaligned by 18.5 meters from the centerline.
After landing, the taxi from the runway to the parking area took 3 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 444 nautical miles, with a total flight time of 62 minutes and fuel consumption of 3,179 kilograms.
Let's start by recognizing the strong points of this aircraft landing score. The Approach Phase of the landing was particularly noteworthy, with an excellent glideslope alignment. Additionally, despite the slight deviation in threshold speed being slightly above target at 144 knots, it is still within a reasonable range and does not significantly impact the overall performance.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is commendable that the aircraft maintained a good threshold height. However, the landing flare was only rated as fair, indicating that there may be room for improvement in achieving a smoother touchdown.
Now, looking at the Touchdown Phase, there are both positive and negative aspects to consider. On the positive side, the touchdown distance was good at 334 meters, indicating a well-timed touchdown. However, the touchdown rate was noted to be very hard at -522 ft/m, which suggests a potentially rough landing. The touchdown speed at 142 knots was also slightly fast, which could contribute to the harder landing.
Furthermore, the runway touchdown position being slightly misaligned by 3.8 meters from the centerline is a point to take note of for future landings. Ensuring proper alignment is crucial for safe and efficient landings.
Overall, while this landing score of 90.0% reflects a generally solid performance, there are specific areas where improvements can be made to enhance the overall landing quality. By focusing on maintaining a smoother touchdown, adjusting touchdown speed, and ensuring proper alignment with the runway centerline, the next landing can further improve and achieve an even higher score. Keep up the good work and continue striving for excellence in every phase of the landing process. With dedication and practice, you can further refine your skills and achieve even better results in future landings.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values