Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 4.6 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Fly the flare as one continuous check of the sink rate from 20 ft, holding back pressure steadily rather than adjusting pitch piecemeal.
What happened: The flare drifted away from its intended profile rather than tracking it smoothly from 20 ft down to touchdown.
Watch for: Watch radio altitude and VSI through the flare, aiming to arrest the sink smoothly from 20 ft to touchdown.
See Arrival Landing
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 14 stages, 13 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: off the centreline.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,548 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,548 m of the 3,701 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 539 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport (LHBP), the Airbus A321 began its takeoff roll on runway 13L, accelerating to a liftoff speed of 149 kt in a distance of 734 meters, which accounted for 20% of the available runway length. The aircraft lifted off into a local weather environment characterized by a temperature of 10 °C and a headwind of 7 kt from a direction of 130 °.
As the aircraft transitioned into the enroute climb phase, it began ascending from an altitude of 1,105 ft above sea level to 1,651 ft, a gain of 546 ft in less than 1 minute and covering a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The climb was followed by a 6-minute level cruise phase, during which the aircraft maintained an altitude of 1,651 ft and covered a distance of 16 nautical miles. The final approach phase commenced from a position 3 nautical miles from the runway, heading 302.0 °, and at an altitude of 732 ft above ground level.
The Airbus A321 touched down on runway 31R at LHBP, with a touchdown speed of 113 kt, which was slightly above the target speed. The touchdown point was 122 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, and the aircraft's touchdown rate was an excellent -88 fpm. The total landing distance was 1,466 meters, accounting for 40% of the available runway length. Following touchdown, the aircraft's rollout alignment was slightly misaligned from the centerline by 8.3 meters. The flight utilized a total of 22 nautical miles of distance and consumed 8,804 kg of fuel during the 9-minute duration.
The aircraft touched down on runway 31R at LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport with a threshold speed slightly above the target at 123 kt. The approach quality was good, with a stable and controlled descent from 732 ft agl at 3 nm. The threshold height was satisfactory, allowing for a smooth transition to the runway. The touchdown point was 122 m beyond the touchdown zone, indicating a slight overrun.
The touchdown speed of 113 kt was a little fast, but the touchdown rate of -88 fpm was excellent, demonstrating good control and precision. However, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.2 m from the centreline, which was also reflected in the rollout alignment, which was off by 8.3 m from the centreline. The crosswind component was negligible, with a wind of 7 kt at 130 °, and a tailwind of 7 kt.
The total landing distance of 1,466 m was 40% of the runway length, indicating a relatively short landing distance. Overall, the landing performance was satisfactory, with a score of 96.9%. The slight deviations from the centreline and the slightly fast touchdown speed were the main areas for improvement. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 8 °C and a light wind, contributed to a stable and controlled approach and landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values