Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Track the centreline
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 18 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 1,000 ft gate: centreline 1.8° off, against a 1° limit and wings 25° of bank, against a 10° limit.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,490 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 559 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departure from Groningen Airport Eelde, EHGG, commenced with a departure roll on runway 23. The Phenom 300E, with its Tristan interior, accelerated down the 2,172-meter runway, reaching a liftoff speed of 133 knots. The aircraft lifted off at 87% of the runway's length, taking advantage of the favorable local weather conditions, with a temperature of 15°C and a negligible wind of 1 knot from 270 degrees.
As the aircraft transitioned to the enroute climb phase, it began to ascend from 997 feet above sea level to 1,845 feet, an increase of 848 feet in just one minute, covering a distance of 4 nautical miles. This initial climb phase was followed by a brief level cruise at 2,235 feet above sea level, lasting three minutes and covering less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft then resumed climbing, reaching an altitude of 3,489 feet above sea level, an increase of 1,254 feet in three minutes, covering 5 nautical miles. The enroute descent phase began overhead Zuidlaren, with the aircraft descending from 3,467 feet to 468 feet above sea level, a decrease of 2,999 feet in three minutes, covering 7 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 23 at EHGG was initiated from the north-east, with the aircraft descending from 2,108 feet above sea level to 1,120 feet, a decrease of 988 feet in two minutes, covering 4 nautical miles. The aircraft landed on the 2,493-meter runway, with a touchdown point 136 meters beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed of 94 knots and touchdown rate of -162 feet per minute were both within acceptable limits. The total landing distance was 1,091 meters, or 44% of the runway length. The aircraft's rollout alignment was perfect, and the total flight distance was 46 nautical miles, taking 18 minutes and consuming 114 kilograms of fuel.
The final approach to runway 23 at EHGG Groningen Airport Eelde from the north east was conducted with a heading of 226.0° at 3 nautical miles and 1,100 feet above ground level. The approach quality was satisfactory, with a threshold height of 61 feet above ground level, which was above the target. The threshold speed of 109 knots was slightly above the target, indicating a slight delay in the flare.
The touchdown characteristics were good, with a touchdown speed of 94 knots and a touchdown rate of -162 feet per minute. The touchdown point was 136 meters beyond the touchdown zone, which is within acceptable limits. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, indicating a high degree of control and precision during the landing. The local weather conditions were favorable, with a temperature of 15°C and a wind of 1 knot at 270°, resulting in a negligible crosswind and headwind component.
The total landing distance of 1,091 meters was 44% of the runway length, which is within acceptable limits. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, indicating a smooth and controlled deceleration after touchdown. Overall, the landing performance was satisfactory, with a score of 96.6%. The slight delay in the flare and the touchdown point being beyond the touchdown zone were the only notable deviations from the ideal landing performance.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values