Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the rollout
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with five checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,494 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 445 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, the Embraer E190 began its journey by taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took approximately 8 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. As it reached the runway, the aircraft started its departure roll on runway 24, accelerating to a liftoff speed of 144 knots. The takeoff distance of 1,442 meters, which accounted for 45% of the runway, was achieved in a relatively short period.
As the aircraft climbed away from the airport, it transitioned into an enroute climb, which began approximately 1 mile northwest of Aalsmeerderbrug. The climb phase saw the aircraft ascend from 986 feet above sea level to 34,887 feet, a vertical increase of 33,902 feet, in just 16 minutes and covering a distance of 147 nautical miles. Following the climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which lasted for 9 minutes and covered a distance of 167 nautical miles. The cruise phase was initiated approximately 66 miles north of Ballum, in the Provincie Friesland, The Netherlands. As the aircraft approached its destination, it began its enroute descent, which started 58 miles southwest of Vestbygd, in Agder, Norway. The descent phase saw the aircraft descend from 34,998 feet to 1,413 feet above sea level, a vertical decrease of 33,585 feet, in 12 minutes and covering a distance of 111 nautical miles.
As the aircraft entered the final approach phase, it aligned itself with runway 18 at Stavanger Airport, Sola, from the north, heading 179.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,386 feet above ground level. The aircraft touched down on the runway at a speed of 128 knots, which was slightly faster than the target speed. The touchdown distance of 445 meters was good, and the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 5.4 meters from the centerline. Following the landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, a process that took approximately 2 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 434 nautical miles, and the aircraft used 2,497 kilograms of fuel during the journey, which took a total of 46 minutes.
The Embraer E190 touched down on runway 18 at ENZV Stavanger Airport, Sola, with a good threshold height, allowing the pilots to maintain a stable approach. The threshold speed of 135 kt was significantly above the target, indicating a high level of control and precision during the final stages of the approach. The aircraft's descent was well-managed, resulting in a touchdown distance of 445 m, which was within acceptable limits.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's speed of 128 kt was slightly faster than desired, but the rate of descent of -175 fpm was good, indicating a controlled touchdown. However, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 5.4 m from the centreline, which may have been due to the 1 kt crosswind component. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 2 °C and a 6 kt headwind, did not appear to have a significant impact on the landing.
The total landing distance of 1,436 m, which accounted for 58% of the runway length, was acceptable. The rollout alignment was very good, with the aircraft maintaining a consistent path along the centreline. Overall, the landing was considered to be of high quality, with a score of 97.5% reflecting the pilots' skill and attention to detail during the approach and touchdown phases.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values