Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 21 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,894 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 622 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 87.5% indicates a decent performance with room for improvement.
The Approach Phase had issues with the descent path being above the glideslope limit, which may have contributed to the problems in the Landing Phase. It is important to ensure that the aircraft is on the correct descent path to make a smooth and safe landing.
In the Landing Phase, the threshold height was well above the target, and the landing flare was very poor. These factors can affect the touchdown quality and overall landing performance. It is crucial for pilots to focus on achieving the correct threshold height and executing a proper landing flare to ensure a smooth touchdown.
On a positive note, the Touchdown Phase had a smooth touchdown rate and the speed was on target. However, the touchdown point being 187 m beyond the touchdown zone and the runway touchdown position being 6.1 m from the centerline indicate a need for improvement in landing accuracy.
In the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was off by 5.4 m from the centerline. This highlights the importance of maintaining proper alignment during the landing rollout to ensure safe taxiing and runway clearance.
Overall, while there were some areas of concern in the landing performance, there were also some positive aspects to build upon. With attention to detail and continued practice, the pilot can work towards achieving a higher landing score in future flights. Keep up the good work and continue striving for improvement in all phases of the landing process.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values