Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 6.7 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Begin the flare with progressive back pressure and keep it coming until the sink is arrested, rather than flying it on flat.
What happened: The nose was barely raised in the flare and little of the sink was taken out, flying the aircraft onto the runway. This pattern usually carries through to a firm touchdown with a noticeable sink rate.
Watch for: Vertical speed indicator: a smoothly reducing sink through the normal flare band, not a steady rate into the runway.
A crosswind landing is a geometry problem. The air mass you're flying in is moving sideways across the runway, and you need your ground track down the centreline with your wheels aligned to it at the moment of contact. There are two techniques that will help, the crab and the sideslip.
Read more in Crosswind Landings in the SimStart to finish · 27 stages, 25 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,944 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 317 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the aircraft taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 6 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The Airbus A320 then departed from runway 07 at ENBO Bodø Airport, with a takeoff distance of 992 meters, which accounted for 36% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 159 knots.
As the aircraft took off, it encountered local weather conditions of 18°C temperature and a wind speed of 20 knots at 89°. The crosswind was 4 knots, while the headwind was 20 knots. The enroute climb started overhead Bodo, with the aircraft ascending from 1,085 feet above sea level to 38,033 feet above sea level, an increase of 36,948 feet in 21 minutes, covering 137 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise began 12 miles east of Terrak, lasting 23 minutes and covering 170 nautical miles. The aircraft then started its enroute descent 24 miles north of EN25 Solenstua, descending from 38,175 feet above sea level to 9,199 feet above sea level, a decrease of 28,977 feet in 22 minutes, covering 132 nautical miles. This was followed by another enroute level cruise, which started 9 miles west of Skotterud and lasted 7 minutes, covering 27 nautical miles.
The enroute descent began 3 miles south of ENSV Trøgstad Airfield Skjonhaug, with the aircraft descending from 9,182 feet above sea level to 3,484 feet above sea level, a decrease of 5,697 feet in 7 minutes, covering 26 nautical miles. The aircraft then entered another enroute level cruise, which started 1 mile north-west of Frogner and lasted 2 minutes, covering 6 nautical miles.
The enroute climb began 2 miles north-west of Jessheim, with the aircraft ascending from 3,525 feet above sea level to 6,963 feet above sea level, an increase of 3,438 feet in 2 minutes, covering 10 nautical miles. The enroute descent started 3 miles south of Minnesund, with the aircraft descending from 6,878 feet above sea level to 4,455 feet above sea level, a decrease of 2,423 feet in 3 minutes, covering 8 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another enroute level cruise, which started 5 miles north-east of Nordkisa and lasted 3 minutes, covering 13 nautical miles. The enroute descent began 1 mile north-west of Lorenfallet, with the aircraft descending from 4,027 feet above sea level to 3,321 feet above sea level, a decrease of 706 feet in 2 minutes, covering 5 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another enroute level cruise, which started 1 mile east of Lillestrom and lasted 2 minutes, covering 4 nautical miles. The enroute descent began 2 miles west of Frogner, with the aircraft descending from 3,315 feet above sea level to 1,979 feet above sea level, a decrease of 1,336 feet in 2 minutes, covering 6 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 01R at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen began from the south, heading 16.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,288 feet above ground level. The landing on runway 01R was successful, with a touchdown distance of 320 meters and a touchdown speed of 132 knots, which was a little fast. The touchdown rate was very hard at -504 feet per minute, but the runway touchdown alignment was perfect.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were
The Airbus A320 successfully landed on runway 01R at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, with a score of 93.5%. The aircraft approached the runway from the south, heading 16.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,288 feet above ground level (agl). The pilot maintained a good threshold height, which is a crucial aspect of a safe landing.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's threshold speed was within the acceptable range at 135 knots. However, the touchdown speed of 132 knots was slightly faster than ideal, which may have contributed to a harder-than-expected touchdown. The touchdown rate of -504 feet per minute (fpm) was indeed very hard, indicating that the aircraft may have touched down with a higher-than-desired vertical velocity.
Despite the slightly fast touchdown speed, the aircraft's touchdown distance of 320 meters was good, and the runway touchdown alignment was perfect. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were favorable, with a temperature of 21°C and a wind speed of 13 knots at 310°. The crosswind component was 12 knots, while the headwind component was 5 knots.
The total landing distance of 1,056 meters was 36% of the runway length, which is a relatively short distance. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 9.8 meters from the centerline, indicating that the aircraft may have deviated from the intended path during the rollout phase. Overall, the landing was successful, but there is room for improvement in terms of touchdown speed and rollout alignment.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values