This flight began with an Airbus A320 taking off from Santos Dumont Airport in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and climbing to a higher altitude. The aircraft started its ascent from 2,461 feet above sea level and reached 1,110 feet above sea level in just 2 minutes, covering a distance of 4 nautical miles. This rapid climb demonstrates the aircraft's ability to efficiently gain altitude.
As the flight progressed, the aircraft began its final approach to runway 33 at Rio Galeão – Tom Jobim International Airport. The approach was made from the southeast, with the aircraft heading 305.0 degrees at an altitude of 1,082 feet above ground level and a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway. The approach was likely a critical phase of the flight, requiring precise control and navigation to ensure a safe landing.
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down on runway 33, which has a length of 3,053 meters. The threshold height at 107 feet above ground level was found to be excessively high, indicating that the aircraft may have been slightly above the recommended landing height. However, the threshold speed of 129 knots was within the acceptable range. The touchdown point was 175 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, and the touchdown speed of 122 knots was also within the acceptable range.
Despite the relatively good touchdown speed, the touchdown rate was found to be very hard, with a rate of -523 feet per minute. This suggests that the aircraft may have experienced a significant deceleration upon touchdown, which could have put additional stress on the landing gear and other aircraft systems. Additionally, the runway touchdown position was found to be slightly misaligned from the centerline by 4.9 meters.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 15 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 5 knots from 348 degrees. The crosswind component was 3 knots, while the headwind component was 4 knots. These conditions may have contributed to the slightly misaligned touchdown position.
The total landing distance was 1,107 meters, which is equivalent to 36% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating that the aircraft was able to decelerate quickly and efficiently after touchdown. The runway rollout alignment was found to be very good, suggesting that the aircraft was able to maintain a stable and controlled descent after touchdown.
In terms of overall performance, the flight was relatively short, covering a total distance of 7 nautical miles in 3 minutes. The aircraft used a total of 59 kilograms of fuel during the flight, which is a relatively low amount considering the short distance traveled. Overall, the flight appears to have been executed safely and efficiently, with the aircraft performing well in terms of climb, approach, and landing.
Replay this flight in 3D — the full flight path over the terrain with every stage, event and score along the route.
Enroute climb started overhead SBRJ Santos Dumont Airport Rio de Janeiro (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). Climbing from 2,461 ft asl to 1,110 ft asl, an increase of 1,351 ft in 2 minutes and covering 4 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average speed 141 kt 133 kt min to max 153 kt |
153 | 133 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 3.9 ° 0.0 ° min to max 5.4 ° |
0.3 | 1.9 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.96 g min to max 1.06 g |
1.00 | 1.05 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -876 fpm -1,089 fpm min to max -644 fpm |
-766 | -850 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 1,528 ft asl 1,110 ft asl min to max 2,461 ft asl |
2,461 | 1,110 ft asl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 1.9 ° 0.0 ° min to max 5.2 ° |
0.0 | 5.2 ° | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 |
Approaching runway 33 at SBGL Rio Galeão – Tom Jobim International Airport from 4 nm to 3 nm. Descent from 1,082 ft agl to 854 ft agl. A decrease of 228 ft in 26 seconds.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Approach angle 2.6 ° 2.6 ° min to max 2.7 ° Target 3.0 ° |
2.6 | 2.7 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 131 kt 130 kt min to max 133 kt |
133 | 131 kt | |
| 100 % |
Heading variation 0.4 ° 0.3 ° min to max 0.5 ° |
0.3 | 0.5 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 0.6 ° 0.0 ° min to max 2.0 ° |
0.7 | 1.8 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.01 g 0.99 g min to max 1.05 g |
1.05 | 1.01 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -520 fpm -750 fpm min to max -268 fpm |
-750 | -268 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 952 ft agl 854 ft agl min to max 1,082 ft agl |
1,082 | 854 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 5.3 ° 5.0 ° min to max 6.4 ° |
5.2 | 6.3 ° |
Approaching runway 33 at SBGL Rio Galeão – Tom Jobim International Airport from 3 nm to 2 nm. Descent from 847 ft agl to 715 ft agl. A decrease of 132 ft in 27 seconds.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Approach angle 3.1 ° 2.7 ° min to max 3.4 ° Target 3.0 ° |
2.7 | 3.4 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 130 kt 128 kt min to max 132 kt |
131 | 132 kt | |
| 100 % |
Heading variation 0.4 ° 0.4 ° min to max 0.5 ° |
0.5 | 0.4 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 0.5 ° 0.0 ° min to max 1.3 ° |
0.3 | 0.2 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 0.99 g 0.96 g min to max 1.00 g |
1.00 | 0.99 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -285 fpm -514 fpm min to max -205 fpm |
-229 | -514 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 793 ft agl 715 ft agl min to max 847 ft agl |
847 | 715 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 6.0 ° 4.2 ° min to max 6.8 ° |
6.3 | 4.4 ° |
Approaching runway 33 at SBGL Rio Galeão – Tom Jobim International Airport from 2 nm to 1 nm. Descent from 706 ft agl to 375 ft agl. A decrease of 331 ft in 25 seconds.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 91.82 % |
Approach angle 3.5 ° 3.4 ° min to max 3.6 ° Target 3.0 ° |
3.4 | 3.5 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 135 kt 133 kt min to max 137 kt |
133 | 137 kt | |
| 100 % |
Heading variation 0.4 ° 0.4 ° min to max 0.5 ° |
0.4 | 0.5 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 0.6 ° 0.1 ° min to max 1.0 ° |
0.9 | 0.8 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 0.99 g 0.95 g min to max 1.01 g |
1.00 | 1.01 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -757 fpm -935 fpm min to max -521 fpm |
-523 | -900 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 555 ft agl 375 ft agl min to max 706 ft agl |
706 | 375 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 3.5 ° 2.9 ° min to max 4.4 ° |
4.4 | 3.3 ° |
Approaching runway 33 at SBGL Rio Galeão – Tom Jobim International Airport from 1 nm to 0 nm. Descent from 346 ft agl to 136 ft agl. A decrease of 210 ft in 20 seconds.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 58.33 % |
Approach angle 4.1 ° 3.4 ° min to max 5.8 ° Target 3.0 ° |
3.4 | 5.8 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 134 kt 130 kt min to max 137 kt |
136 | 130 kt | |
| 100 % |
Heading variation 0.2 ° 0.2 ° min to max 0.3 ° |
0.3 | 0.2 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 0.3 ° 0.0 ° min to max 0.6 ° |
0.0 | 0.3 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.97 g min to max 1.03 g |
1.01 | 0.99 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -646 fpm -875 fpm min to max -530 fpm |
-875 | -697 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 238 ft agl 136 ft agl min to max 346 ft agl |
346 | 136 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 4.2 ° 3.7 ° min to max 4.5 ° |
3.7 | 4.2 ° | |
| Info |
Gear not down at 11:19:22 |
Landing on runway 33 at SBGL Rio Galeão – Tom Jobim International Airport, runway length 3,053 m. Threshold height at 107 ft agl was excessively over target. Threshold speed was good at 129 kt.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Threshold speed was good at 129 kt. Target 130 kt |
|||
| 0 % |
Target 50 ft agl |
|||
| 0 % |
Landing and flare profile |
|||
| 100 % |
Heading variation 0.1 ° 0.1 ° min to max 0.1 ° |
0.1 | 0.1 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 0.1 ° 0.0 ° min to max 0.2 ° |
0.1 | 0.2 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.02 g 0.99 g min to max 1.04 g |
0.99 | 1.02 g | |
| Info |
Average speed 126 kt 122 kt min to max 129 kt |
129 | 122 kt | |
| Info |
Average VSI -677 fpm -768 fpm min to max -523 fpm |
-734 | -523 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 40 ft agl 4 ft agl min to max 107 ft agl |
107 | 4 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 5.8 ° 4.4 ° min to max 6.5 ° |
4.4 | 6.5 ° | |
| Info |
Autopilot Yaw Damper Deactivated at 11:19:49 |
Touchdown point was 175 m beyond the touchdown zone. Touchdown speed at 122 kt was good. Touchdown rate was very hard at -523 fpm. Runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 4.9 m from centreline. Local weather - Temperature 15 °C. Wind 5 kt at 348 °. Crosswind: 3 kt Headwind: 4 kt.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 85.42 % |
Touchdown VSI was -523 fpm. |
|||
| 85.13 % |
Touchdown distance was 593 m Target 457 m |
|||
| 100 % |
Speed at touchdown 122 kt Target below 127 kt |
|||
| 93.16 % |
Runway alignment max 4.93 m 4.63 m left |
4.93 | 4.29 m | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 0.5 ° 0.1 ° min to max 0.6 ° |
0.2 | 0.6 ° | |
| 96.86 % |
Average g force 1.32 g 1.02 g min to max 1.61 g |
1.02 | 1.10 g | |
| 100 % |
Landing Bounce |
|||
| Info |
Average speed 122 kt 121 kt min to max 122 kt |
122 | 121 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 6.1 ° 5.9 ° min to max 6.5 ° |
6.5 | 6.1 ° |
Total landing distance 1,107 m, 36 % of runway. Runway rollout alignment was very good.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Landing distance 1,107 m 36 % of runway. |
|||
| 95.88 % |
Runway alignment max 5.59 m 4.18 m left to 1.41 m right |
4.18 | 1.12 m | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.01 g 0.97 g min to max 1.07 g |
1.07 | 1.00 g | |
| Info |
Average speed 109 kt 62 kt min to max 118 kt |
118 | 62 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 4.3 ° -0.4 ° min to max 6.5 ° |
6.2 | -0.3 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.3 ° 0.0 ° min to max 0.6 ° |
0.6 | 0.0 ° | |
| Info |
Battery Master On at 11:16:05 |
|||
| Info |
Engine 1 Started at 11:16:05 |
|||
| Info |
Engine 2 Started at 11:16:05 |
|||
| Info |
Beacon Lights Switched On at 11:16:05 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Lights Switched On at 11:16:05 |
|||
| Info |
Navigation Lights Switched On at 11:16:05 |
|||
| Info |
Strobe Lights Switched On at 11:16:05 |
|||
| Info |
Taxi Lights Switched On at 11:16:05 |
|||
| Info |
Autopilot Heading Hold Activated at 11:16:05 |
|||
| Info |
Autopilot Flight Director Activated at 11:16:05 |
|||
| Info |
Autopilot Yaw Damper Activated at 11:16:05 |
|||
| Info |
Autopilot AutoThrottle Arm Armed at 11:16:05 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Gear Down at 11:16:05 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 4 at 11:16:05 |
|||
| Info |
Autopilot AutoThrottle Arm Disarmed at 11:16:07 |
Exiting runway, average speed 42 kt
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| Info |
Average speed 39 kt 13 kt min to max 58 kt |
58 | 13 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -0.1 ° -0.5 ° min to max 0.2 ° |
-0.2 | -0.5 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.1 ° 0.0 ° min to max 0.2 ° |
0.0 | 0.2 ° | |
| Info |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.99 g min to max 1.01 g |
1.00 | 0.99 g |
The Airbus A320 has successfully landed at SBGL Rio Galeão – Tom Jobim International Airport, but with some notable deviations from the ideal landing parameters. The aircraft was approaching the runway from the southeast, heading 305.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,082 feet above ground level (agl). The final approach was executed with a good threshold speed of 129 knots, which is within the acceptable range.
However, the threshold height at 107 feet agl was excessively over the target, indicating that the aircraft was higher than desired at the point of touchdown. This could be attributed to a slight miscalculation in the approach or a minor deviation in the aircraft's descent rate. Despite this, the touchdown speed of 122 knots was within the acceptable range, indicating that the pilot had maintained control of the aircraft's speed during the landing.
The touchdown point was 175 meters beyond the touchdown zone, which is a relatively minor deviation. The touchdown rate, however, was very hard at -523 feet per minute (fpm), which is significantly higher than the ideal rate. This could be a concern, as a hard touchdown can put excessive stress on the aircraft's landing gear and potentially lead to damage.
The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 4.9 meters from the centerline, which is a minor deviation. The local weather conditions were favorable, with a temperature of 15°C and a gentle wind of 5 knots at 348°. The crosswind was minimal at 3 knots, and the headwind was 4 knots, which helped to stabilize the aircraft during the landing.
The total landing distance was 1,107 meters, which is 36% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating that the pilot had maintained control of the aircraft's speed and descent rate during the landing. The runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating that the pilot had successfully aligned the aircraft with the runway centerline after touchdown.
Overall, while the landing was not perfect, the pilot had maintained control of the aircraft throughout the approach and landing, and the deviations from the ideal parameters were relatively minor. With some adjustments to the approach and landing technique, the pilot can improve the overall quality of the landing.
Drag to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values