Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Use smaller, smoother aileron inputs to hold the climb bank angle near wings-level.
What happened: During Climb 3 the bank angle averaged 6.9°, well beyond a steady wings-level climb.
Watch for: Attitude indicator - bank angle, keeping it close to wings-level through the climb.
Arrival
Raise the nose more slowly in the flare and stop as soon as the sink is checked; if it balloons, hold the attitude.
What happened: The flare ballooned, with 257 fpm of sink returning after the arrest; a balloon like this usually carries through to a firm touchdown, as it did here at 381 fpm.
Watch for: The runway ahead: the aircraft still sinking gently towards it through the flare, never rising.
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 21 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,544 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,544 m of the 2,822 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 567 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the Airbus A220-300 taxiing from the parking area to the runway at Milano Linate Airport, taking 7 minutes and covering a distance of 2 nautical miles. Departure roll took place on runway 36, with the aircraft lifting off at a speed of 158 knots. The local weather conditions at the time of takeoff were characterized by a temperature of 36 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 6 knots from a direction of 169 degrees.
As the aircraft climbed to a higher altitude, it began its enroute climb from 1,374 feet above sea level to 37,277 feet above sea level, an increase of 35,903 feet in 16 minutes, covering a distance of 115 nautical miles. The climb started overhead the Idroscalo Milan, a location in Lombardia, Italy. Following the climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which lasted for 46 minutes and covered a distance of 340 nautical miles. This phase began 1 mile east of Chatel-Saint-Denis, a location in the Canton de Fribourg, Switzerland.
The aircraft then began its enroute descent from 36,940 feet above sea level to 7,463 feet above sea level, a decrease of 29,476 feet in 20 minutes, covering a distance of 24 nautical miles. This descent started overhead Oostvoorne, a location in the Provincie Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands. Following the descent, the aircraft entered another level cruise phase, which lasted for 3 minutes and covered a distance of 12 nautical miles. This phase began 1 mile south east of Alphen aan den Rijn, a location in the Provincie Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands.
The aircraft then began its final descent from 7,383 feet above sea level to 2,016 feet above sea level, a decrease of 5,368 feet in 5 minutes, covering a distance of 8 nautical miles. This descent started overhead EHAM Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, a location in the Provincie Noord-Holland, The Netherlands. Following the descent, the aircraft entered another level cruise phase, which lasted for 9 minutes and covered a distance of 9 nautical miles. This phase began 1 mile south east of Amsterdam-Zuidoost, a location in the Provincie Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.
The final approach to runway 36R at EHAM Amsterdam Airport Schiphol was made from the south, with the aircraft heading 5.0 degrees at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,219 feet above ground level. The landing took place on runway 36R, which had a length of 2,822 meters. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was slightly above the target speed at 153 knots.
The touchdown point was 148 meters beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 138 knots, which was considered good. However, the touchdown rate was hard at -454 feet per minute. The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 9.5 meters from the centreline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 22 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 10 knots from a direction of 340 degrees.
The total landing distance was 1,459 meters, which was 52% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was misaligned by 20.4 meters from the centreline. Following the landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, taking 7 minutes and covering a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 515 nautical miles, taking 111 minutes, and the aircraft used 2,202 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A220-300 aircraft successfully landed on runway 36R at EHAM Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, but with some notable deviations from the ideal landing performance. The final approach was initiated from the south, heading 5.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,219 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft touched down on the runway, but the touchdown point was 148 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone.
The touchdown speed of 138 knots was within the acceptable range, indicating a good control of the aircraft's descent. However, the touchdown rate was relatively hard, at -454 feet per minute (fpm), which may have contributed to the slight deviation from the centerline. The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 9.5 meters from the centerline, which could have been a result of the hard touchdown or the pilot's control inputs.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were favorable, with a temperature of 22°C and a gentle wind of 10 knots from 340°. The crosswind component was minimal, at 4 knots, while the headwind component was 9 knots. These conditions would have made the landing relatively straightforward, but the aircraft's performance still deviated from the ideal.
The total landing distance of 1,459 meters was 52% of the available runway length, which is within the acceptable range. However, the runway rollout alignment was misaligned by 20.4 meters from the centerline, indicating that the aircraft's brakes may not have been fully effective in bringing the aircraft to a stop. Overall, while the landing was successful, there were some notable deviations from the ideal performance, which may require further analysis and improvement.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values