Track every flight, analyse your performance,
and master your flying skills with My FS Flights
Get 10 flights free every month!
Tracked and analysed flights over miles
This flight was operated by an Airbus A319 aircraft, which began its enroute climb from a location 2 miles northeast of Burlingame, California. The aircraft started its ascent from an altitude of 538 feet above sea level and quickly rose to 354 feet, a gain of 184 feet in less than a minute, while covering a distance of less than 1 nautical mile.
As the aircraft approached San Francisco International Airport (KSFO), it began its final approach to runway 28R from the southeast, heading at 298.0 degrees at a distance of 1 nautical mile and an altitude of 333 feet above ground level. The aircraft successfully landed on the runway, which measured 11,537 feet in length, with a good threshold height. However, the threshold speed was above the target speed at 131 knots.
The touchdown distance was satisfactory at 928 feet, but the touchdown speed of 118 knots was slightly faster than desired. The touchdown rate was firm at -382 feet per minute. Unfortunately, the runway touchdown position was misaligned by 25 feet from the centerline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 54 degrees Fahrenheit.
The total landing distance covered by the aircraft was 2,608 feet, which accounted for 23% of the runway length. Furthermore, the runway rollout alignment was excessively misaligned by 160 feet from the centerline. After landing, the aircraft took 4 minutes to taxi to the parking area from the runway, covering a distance of less than 1 nautical mile.
In summary, the flight was relatively short, covering a total distance of 2 nautical miles and lasting 5 minutes. The aircraft used 273 pounds of fuel during the flight.
Replay this flight in 3D — the full flight path over the terrain with every stage, event and score along the route.
Enroute climb started 2 miles north east of Burlingame (California, United States). Climbing from 538 ft asl to 354 ft asl, an increase of 184 ft in less than 1 minute. and covering less than 1 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average speed 131 kt 130 kt min to max 131 kt |
130 | 131 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 0.5 ° 0.1 ° min to max 1.3 ° |
0.2 | 0.1 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.98 g min to max 1.02 g |
1.01 | 0.98 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -678 fpm -724 fpm min to max -648 fpm |
-675 | -672 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 455 ft asl 354 ft asl min to max 538 ft asl |
538 | 354 ft asl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -1.7 ° -1.8 ° min to max -1.6 ° |
-1.7 | -1.7 ° | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 | |
| Info |
Taxi Lights Off at 23:10:53 |
|||
| Info |
Navigation Lights On at 23:10:53 |
|||
| Info |
Beacon Lights On at 23:10:53 |
|||
| Info |
Strobe Lights On at 23:10:53 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Lights Off at 23:10:53 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Gear Down at 23:10:53 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 4 at 23:10:53 |
|||
| Info |
Parking Brake Off at 23:10:53 |
Approaching runway 28R at KSFO San Francisco International Airport from 2 nm to 1 nm. Descent from 333 ft agl to 310 ft agl. A decrease of 23 ft in 2 seconds.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Approach angle 3.0 ° 3.0 ° min to max 3.0 ° Target 3.0 ° |
3.0 | 3.0 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 131 kt 131 kt min to max 131 kt |
131 | 131 kt | |
| 100 % |
Heading variation -0.1 ° -0.1 ° min to max -0.1 ° |
-0.1 | -0.1 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 0.5 ° 0.3 ° min to max 0.6 ° |
0.6 | 0.4 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.01 g 0.99 g min to max 1.04 g |
0.99 | 1.04 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -700 fpm -706 fpm min to max -687 fpm |
-687 | -706 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 322 ft agl 310 ft agl min to max 333 ft agl |
333 | 310 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -1.8 ° -1.9 ° min to max -1.8 ° |
-1.8 | -1.9 ° |
Approaching runway 28R at KSFO San Francisco International Airport from 1 nm to 0 nm. Descent from 299 ft agl to 39 ft agl. A decrease of 260 ft in 26 seconds.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Approach angle 2.9 ° 2.8 ° min to max 3.0 ° Target 3.0 ° |
3.0 | 2.8 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 131 kt 131 kt min to max 132 kt |
131 | 131 kt | |
| 100 % |
Heading variation -0.0 ° -0.0 ° min to max -0.0 ° |
-0.0 | -0.0 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 0.5 ° 0.0 ° min to max 1.2 ° |
0.2 | 0.3 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.01 g 0.99 g min to max 1.02 g |
0.99 | 1.01 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -678 fpm -709 fpm min to max -643 fpm |
-662 | -659 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 88 ft agl 39 ft agl min to max 299 ft agl |
299 | 39 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -1.3 ° -1.7 ° min to max -1.0 ° |
-1.6 | -1.0 ° |
Landing on runway 28R at KSFO San Francisco International Airport, runway length 11,537 ft. Good threshold height. Threshold speed was well above target at 131 kt.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Threshold speed was well above target at 131 kt. Target 119 kt |
|||
| 100 % |
Target 50 ft agl |
|||
| 82.19 % |
Landing and flare profile |
|||
| 100 % |
Heading variation -0.0 ° -0.1 ° min to max 0.0 ° |
-0.0 | 0.0 ° | |
| 78.53 % |
Average bank angle 2.4 ° 0.2 ° min to max 10.2 ° |
0.4 | 1.2 ° | |
| 28.29 % |
Average g force 1.08 g 0.61 g min to max 4.01 g |
1.01 | 1.03 g | |
| Info |
Average speed 128 kt 118 kt min to max 131 kt |
131 | 118 kt | |
| Info |
Average VSI -677 fpm -822 fpm min to max -382 fpm |
-658 | -382 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 21 ft agl -6 ft agl min to max 43 ft agl |
43 | -6 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -0.7 ° -1.2 ° min to max 1.2 ° |
-1.0 | -1.1 ° |
Touchdown distance was good at 928 ft. Touchdown speed at 118 kt was a little fast. Touchdown rate was firm at -382 fpm. Runway touchdown position was misaligned by 25 ft from centreline. Local weather - Temperature 54 °F. .
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 90.29 % |
Touchdown VSI was -382 fpm. |
|||
| 100 % |
Touchdown distance was 928 ft Target 1,500 ft |
|||
| 100 % |
Speed at touchdown 118 kt Target below 116 kt |
|||
| 83.26 % |
Runway alignment max 25.1 ft 17.5 ft left |
10.0 | 25.1 ft | |
| 84 % |
Average bank angle 2.8 ° 1.2 ° min to max 3.3 ° |
1.2 | 3.2 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 0.97 g 0.85 g min to max 1.09 g |
1.03 | 0.85 g | |
| 100 % |
Landing Bounce |
|||
| Info |
Average speed 117 kt 116 kt min to max 118 kt |
118 | 116 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -0.7 ° -1.1 ° min to max -0.1 ° |
-1.1 | -0.1 ° |
Total landing distance 2,608 ft, 23 % of runway. Runway rollout alignment was excessively misaligned by 160 ft from centreline.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Landing distance 2,608 ft 23 % of runway. |
|||
| 0 % |
Runway alignment max 159.6 ft 159.6 ft left to 0.0 ft left |
27.8 | 117.9 ft | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 0.97 g 0.84 g min to max 1.30 g |
0.85 | 1.02 g | |
| Info |
Average speed 57 kt 33 kt min to max 62 kt |
62 | 33 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 0.6 ° -0.1 ° min to max 1.1 ° |
0.1 | 0.7 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 1.1 ° 0.1 ° min to max 3.1 ° |
3.1 | 0.7 ° |
Exiting runway, average speed 16 kt
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| Info |
Average speed 7 kt 1 kt min to max 30 kt |
30 | 6 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 0.3 ° -0.7 ° min to max 0.8 ° |
0.7 | -0.1 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.4 ° 0.0 ° min to max 2.8 ° |
0.6 | 0.2 ° | |
| Info |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.97 g min to max 1.02 g |
1.01 | 1.00 g | |
| Info |
Parking Brake On at 23:15:34 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 3 at 23:15:42 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Fully Retracted at 23:15:43 |
|||
| Info |
Parking Brake Off at 23:16:01 |
Taxiing to the parking from the runway took 4 minutes and covered less than 1 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average speed 5 kt 0 kt min to max 6 kt |
6 | 0 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average speed turning corners 0 kt max 0 kt |
0 | 0 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.98 g min to max 1.02 g |
1.00 | 1.00 g | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 0.0 ° -0.3 ° min to max 0.5 ° |
-0.2 | 0.2 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.2 ° 0.0 ° min to max 1.0 ° |
0.2 | 0.0 ° | |
| Info |
Parking Brake On at 23:19:58 |
|||
| Info |
Strobe Lights Off at 23:20:07 |
|||
| Info |
Beacon Lights Off at 23:20:10 |
|||
| Info |
Navigation Lights Off at 23:20:11 |
|||
| 0 % |
Taxi Lights at 23:18:44 |
The Airbus A319 aircraft successfully landed on runway 28R at San Francisco International Airport (KSFO) with a score of 84.8%. The final approach was initiated from the southeast, heading 298.0° at 1 nautical mile and 333 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft's approach to the runway was executed with good threshold height, indicating a stable and controlled descent.
However, the threshold speed was above the target speed, reaching 131 knots. This may have been due to the aircraft's high approach speed, which could have been influenced by factors such as wind conditions or the pilot's decision to maintain a higher speed for a more stable approach. The touchdown distance of 928 feet was within acceptable limits, indicating that the aircraft's descent was well-controlled.
Despite the good touchdown distance, the touchdown speed of 118 knots was slightly faster than desired. This may have resulted in a firmer touchdown rate of -382 feet per minute (fpm), which could have put additional stress on the aircraft's landing gear. The runway touchdown position was also misaligned by 25 feet from the centreline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the aircraft's approach path.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 54°F, which was likely within the acceptable range for the aircraft's operation. The total landing distance of 2,608 feet was 23% of the runway length, indicating that the aircraft was able to stop within a reasonable distance.
However, the runway rollout alignment was excessively misaligned by 160 feet from the centreline, which may have been due to a combination of factors including the aircraft's initial touchdown position and the pilot's control inputs during the rollout phase. This misalignment could have resulted in a longer stopping distance and potentially increased the risk of runway excursion. Overall, while the landing was successful, there were some areas for improvement, particularly in terms of touchdown speed and runway rollout alignment.
Drag to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values
