Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Use smaller, smoother aileron inputs to hold the climb bank angle near wings-level.
What happened: During Climb 3 the bank angle averaged 2°, well beyond a steady wings-level climb.
Watch for: Attitude indicator - bank angle, keeping it close to wings-level through the climb.
Arrival
Fly the flare as one continuous check of the sink rate from 17 ft, holding back pressure steadily rather than adjusting pitch piecemeal.
What happened: The flare drifted away from its intended profile rather than tracking it smoothly from 17 ft down to touchdown.
Watch for: Watch radio altitude and VSI through the flare, aiming to arrest the sink smoothly from 17 ft to touchdown.
See Arrival Landing
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
At the 500 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,892 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,892 m of the 3,987 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 648 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Diagoras Airport in LGRP, the Airbus A319 began its journey with a taxiing period of 13 minutes, covering a distance of 3 nautical miles to reach the runway. The departure roll commenced on runway 06, with the aircraft taking off in a distance of 1,582 meters, utilizing 48% of the available runway. The liftoff speed was achieved at 149 knots, as the aircraft lifted off into the local weather conditions of 17°C temperature and a wind of 11 knots at 129 degrees.
As the aircraft climbed to its cruising altitude, it passed overhead Kremasti in the South Aegean region of Greece, where the enroute climb phase began. The aircraft ascended from 1,094 feet above sea level to 35,429 feet, an increase of 34,335 feet, in 19 minutes and covering 107 nautical miles. Following this, the enroute level cruise phase started 12 miles west of Kefalos, lasting 126 minutes and covering 958 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent phase 1 mile south of Bernartice in the Jihocesky kraj region of the Czech Republic, descending from 35,998 feet to 2,849 feet in 21 minutes and covering 121 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 26L at Munich Airport was initiated from the east, with the aircraft heading 264.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,365 feet above ground level. The landing was executed on the 3,987-meter runway, with the threshold height at 67 feet above ground level being above the target. The touchdown speed was 135 knots, and the touchdown point was 229 meters beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 127 knots and a touchdown rate of -159 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, and the runway rollout alignment was perfect. Following the landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area in 9 minutes, covering 2 nautical miles. The total flight distance was 1,199 nautical miles, taking 191 minutes, and the aircraft used 6,934 kilograms of fuel.
The final approach to runway 26L at EDDM Munich Airport from the east was initiated at 4 nm and 1,365 ft above ground level, heading 264.0°. The approach quality was satisfactory, with a threshold height of 67 ft above ground level, which was above the target. However, the threshold speed of 135 kt was within the acceptable range, indicating a good control of the aircraft's descent and speed.
As the aircraft touched down on the runway, the touchdown point was 229 m beyond the touchdown zone, which was slightly off-center. The touchdown speed of 127 kt was a little fast, but the touchdown rate of -159 fpm was good, indicating a controlled descent. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, with the aircraft aligned with the centerline. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 7 °C and a wind of 10 kt at 310°, resulted in a crosswind of 7 kt and a headwind of 7 kt, which did not significantly impact the landing.
The total landing distance of 1,808 m was 45% of the runway length, indicating a relatively short landing distance. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, with the aircraft remaining aligned with the centerline throughout the rollout phase. Overall, the landing was satisfactory, with a score of 91.0%. While there were some minor deviations from the ideal, the pilot demonstrated good control and management of the aircraft throughout the approach and landing phases.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values