Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 7.6 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Reduce power earlier on approach to be at 128 kt by the stabilisation gate, not just by the threshold.
What happened: The approach was too fast at the stabilisation gate, crossing the threshold at 126 kt against a VREF of 128 kt.
Watch for: Airspeed indicator against 128 kt at the stabilisation gate.
See Arrival Approach
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 15 stages, 13 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed 50 kt FAST on the reference speed of 128 kt.
At the 500 ft gate: speed 18 kt FAST on the reference speed of 128 kt.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,990 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 419 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The Airbus A350-900 taxied from the parking area to runway 16R at RJTT Tokyo Haneda International Airport in 6 minutes, covering 3 nm.
During the departure roll on runway 16R, the aircraft accelerated over a takeoff distance of 1,342 m, representing 45 % of the runway length, and lifted off at 158 kt. Local weather at the time was 31 °C with a wind of 8 kt from 179°, a crosswind component of 4 kt and a headwind component of 7 kt.
Climb began 1 mile south of RJTT, with the airplane ascending from 1,044 ft asl to 39,999 ft asl, an increase of 38,955 ft achieved in 30 minutes while covering 200 nm.
Level cruise was established 8 miles west of Sabae (Fukui, Japan) and persisted for 51 minutes, during which the flight covered 408 nm.
Descent commenced 12 miles south of RKTI Jungwon Air Base/Chungju Airport, with the aircraft descending from 40,001 ft asl to 1,289 ft asl, a loss of 38,712 ft in 25 minutes and a distance of 133 nm.
The final approach to Incheon International Airport was flown from 1 nm to 1 nm at 1,238 ft agl, followed by a short touchdown approach that reduced altitude from 32 ft agl to 0 ft agl, a decrease of 32 ft in 6 seconds.
Touchdown occurred at Incheon International Airport with a speed of 122 kt, a vertical rate of minus 291 fpm, and a touchdown distance of 390 m. Weather at the airport was 23 °C with a wind of 1 kt from 340°, a crosswind of 0 kt and a headwind of 1 kt.
Rollout continued on the runway at an altitude of 33 ft asl, covering a distance of 712 m before exiting the runway.
The aircraft taxied from the runway to the parking area in 2 minutes, traveling less than 1 nm.
In total, the flight covered 750 nm, lasted 116 minutes, and consumed 11,074 kg of fuel.
The Airbus A350-900 established a final approach to Incheon International Airport from 1 nm to 1 nm at 1,238 ft agl, with ambient temperature 23 °C, wind 1 kt from 340°, crosswind 0 kt and headwind 1 kt.
During the threshold and flare the aircraft descended from 32 ft agl to 0 ft agl, a decrease of 32 ft achieved in 6 seconds.
Touchdown occurred at a speed of 122 kt, which was a little fast, with a fair vertical rate of minus 291 fpm and a good touchdown distance of 390 m.
The rollout continued at an altitude of 33 ft asl and covered a distance of 712 m.
With a final score of 97.3 %, the landing was strong overall; reducing the touchdown speed slightly and tightening control of the vertical rate will bring the performance even closer to the optimum.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values