Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the rollout
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 15 stages, 13 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,901 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,901 m of the 3,660 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 490 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing Václav Havel Airport Prague, runway 30, the Boeing 737-600 began its journey with a taxiing period of 5 minutes, covering a distance of 1 nautical mile. As the aircraft reached the runway threshold, it initiated its departure roll, utilizing 1,688 meters, or 52% of the runway, to achieve liftoff at a speed of 145 knots. The local weather conditions at the time of departure featured a temperature of 17°C, with a gentle wind of 3 knots at 239 degrees, resulting in a negligible crosswind component.
As the aircraft transitioned into the enroute climb phase, it began its ascent from 2,143 feet above sea level, eventually reaching a cruising altitude of 40,989 feet. This climb phase, which started overhead Knezeves, Czech Republic, covered a distance of 398 nautical miles and took 49 minutes to complete. The aircraft then entered a level cruise phase, lasting 272 minutes and covering 2,238 nautical miles, before initiating its enroute descent phase. This descent, which began 13 miles south-east of Fasa Airport, Iran, saw the aircraft decrease its altitude from 40,875 feet to 1,370 feet in 22 minutes, covering a distance of 163 nautical miles.
As the Boeing 737-600 approached Bandar Abbas International Airport, it began its final approach to runway 21L from the north-east, aligning itself with a heading of 207.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,335 feet above ground level. The aircraft landed on the runway, utilizing 1,816 meters, or 50% of the runway, and touched down at a speed of 116 knots, with a touchdown rate of -182 feet per minute. Although the touchdown point was 70 meters beyond the touchdown zone, and the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned from the centreline, the overall landing performance was considered good. Following a short taxiing period of less than 1 minute, the aircraft came to a stop, having completed a total flight distance of 2,807 nautical miles, utilizing 13,738 kilograms of fuel in the process, and taking a total of 350 minutes to complete the journey.
The Boeing 737-600 touched down on runway 21L at OIKB Bandar Abbas International Airport with a threshold speed slightly above the target at 128 kt. The aircraft maintained a good touchdown speed of 116 kt, and the touchdown rate was also within acceptable limits at -182 fpm. However, the touchdown point was 70 m beyond the designated touchdown zone, which may have been due to the slightly above-target threshold speed.
The aircraft's approach quality was good, with a stable and controlled descent from 1,335 ft agl at 4 nm from the runway. The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 7.9 m from the centreline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the final approach. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 36 °C and a 5 kt headwind, did not appear to have a significant impact on the landing.
The total landing distance of 1,816 m was 50% of the runway length, indicating a good braking performance. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 8.1 m from the centreline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the final stages of the landing. Overall, the landing was considered good, with a score of 97.1%.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values