Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 27 stages, 25 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 5,000 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 5,000 ft of the 9,253 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 1,897 ft past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
While there were some areas for improvement in the approach and landing phases of the aircraft, there were also some positive aspects to highlight in the touchdown phase.
Firstly, in the Approach Phase, it's important to note that the descent path was above the glideslope limit and the speed was slightly below target. For future landings, ensuring that the descent path is within the proper parameters and maintaining the correct speed will help improve overall performance.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it's clear that there were some challenges with the threshold height and landing flare. To address this, pilots should focus on achieving the correct threshold height and executing a smoother landing flare to ensure a more controlled and stable touchdown.
On a positive note, the Touchdown Phase had an excellent touchdown rate and the speed was on target. Additionally, the touchdown point being slightly beyond the touchdown zone is a minor issue that can be easily corrected with practice. The runway touchdown position being slightly off centerline is another area that can be improved with attention to detail and precision during the landing phase.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was slightly off centerline. This is another area that can be refined with practice and attention to detail.
Overall, while there were some issues identified in the aircraft landing score, there were also positive aspects to take note of. By addressing the areas that need improvement and building on the strengths of the touchdown phase, pilots can continue to improve their performance and strive for higher landing scores in the future. Keep up the hard work and dedication to continuous improvement in your landing techniques. You're on the right track!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values