Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Configure earlier
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Two stabilised approach gates, each with five checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: gear still up and sink rate above what the glideslope needed.
At the 500 ft gate: sink rate above what the glideslope needed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,832 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 544 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Aircraft departed from Auckland International Airport (NZAA) on runway 23L, commencing its takeoff roll after a 10-minute taxi from the parking area, covering a distance of 2 nautical miles. The aircraft lifted off at a speed of 153 knots, utilizing 52% of the 1,926-meter runway. The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 16°C.
As the aircraft transitioned into the enroute climb phase, it began ascending from 999 feet above sea level to 38,004 feet, a vertical increase of 37,005 feet, over a distance of 128 nautical miles, within a 21-minute timeframe. The climb phase was followed by a 58-minute level cruise, covering 320 nautical miles, initiated 15 miles northwest of Okato. The aircraft then entered a series of enroute descents, with the first commencing 13 miles south of Mesopotamia Station Airstrip (NZPL), where it descended from 37,678 feet to 10,103 feet, a decrease of 27,574 feet, over a distance of 95 nautical miles, within a 16-minute period. The subsequent level cruise phase, lasting only 2 minutes, covered 7 nautical miles, initiated 6 miles south of Wanaka Airport (NZWF). The final descent phase began 7 miles northwest of Cromwell Airstrip (NZCW), where the aircraft descended from 9,992 feet to 2,517 feet, a decrease of 7,475 feet, over a distance of 17 nautical miles, within a 5-minute timeframe.
The aircraft then commenced its final approach to runway 23 at Queenstown International Airport (NZQN), aligning with the runway from the east at a heading of 255.0°, 3 nautical miles from the threshold, and 1,331 feet above ground level. The landing was characterized by a touchdown point 141 meters beyond the touchdown zone, at a speed of 163 knots, which was slightly above the recommended threshold speed. The touchdown rate was, however, satisfactory at -154 feet per minute. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 5.5 meters from the centerline. The total landing distance was 1,260 meters, accounting for 69% of the 1,836-meter runway. Following a 1-minute taxi to the parking area, covering less than 1 nautical mile, the aircraft completed its journey, having traveled a total distance of 575 nautical miles, utilizing 3,348 kilograms of fuel, and taking a total of 104 minutes to complete the flight.
The final approach to runway 23 at NZQN Queenstown International Airport from the east was executed with a heading of 255.0° at 3 nautical miles and 1,331 feet above ground level. The approach quality was satisfactory, with a good threshold height. However, the threshold speed was excessively high at 178 knots, indicating a potential for a longer landing distance.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft landed 141 meters beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 163 knots, which was too fast. The touchdown rate of -154 feet per minute was good, indicating a controlled descent. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 5.5 meters from the centreline, which may have contributed to the excessive landing distance. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 9°C and a headwind of 2 knots, were relatively calm, with a crosswind of 1 knot and a tailwind component of 2 knots.
The total landing distance of 1,260 meters was 69% of the runway length, indicating a relatively long landing distance. However, the runway rollout alignment was very good, with the aircraft maintaining a consistent path along the centreline. Overall, the landing performance scored 91.2%, with areas for improvement identified in terms of threshold speed and touchdown speed.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values