Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Arrival
Reduce power earlier on final to bleed speed back to 118 kt before crossing the threshold.
What happened: You crossed the threshold at 124 kt, 6 kt above the 118 kt target.
Watch for: Airspeed, targeting 118 kt at the threshold.
See Arrival Landing
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 22 stages, 20 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,570 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 464 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 6 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. The aircraft, an RJ85, then departed from runway 07 at LFPO Paris-Orly Airport. The takeoff distance was 1,061 meters, which accounted for 37% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 139 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 2 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 3 knots at a direction of 60 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 1 knot and a headwind of 3 knots. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, starting overhead Villeneuve-le-Roi in the Ile-de-France region of France. The climb took 18 minutes and covered a distance of 80 nautical miles, during which the aircraft ascended from 1,314 feet above sea level to 27,396 feet above sea level, an increase of 26,082 feet.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, starting 1 mile west of Druyes-les-Belles-Fontaines in the Bourgogne-Franche-Comte region of France. This phase lasted for 12 minutes and covered a distance of 71 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting overhead Bissey-sous-Cruchaud in the Bourgogne-Franche-Comte region of France. The descent took 11 minutes and covered a distance of 58 nautical miles, during which the aircraft descended from 27,389 feet above sea level to 10,941 feet above sea level, a decrease of 16,448 feet.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, starting overhead Mijoux in the Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes region of France. This phase lasted for 2 minutes and covered a distance of 5 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting 1 mile south west of Gingins in the Canton de Vaud region of Switzerland. The descent took 5 minutes and covered a distance of 9 nautical miles, during which the aircraft descended from 10,028 feet above sea level to 4,049 feet above sea level, a decrease of 5,978 feet.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, starting 1 mile south east of Rolle in the Canton de Vaud region of Switzerland. This phase lasted for 2 minutes and covered a distance of 5 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting overhead Nernier in the Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes region of France. The descent took 2 minutes and covered a distance of 5 nautical miles, during which the aircraft descended from 4,033 feet above sea level to 2,650 feet above sea level, a decrease of 1,383 feet.
The final approach to runway 22 at LSGG Geneva Cointrin International Airport was made from the north east, heading 225.0 degrees at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,235 feet above ground level. The landing was made on runway 22, which had a length of 3,570 meters. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was also good at 124 knots. The touchdown distance was good at 463 meters, and the touchdown speed was 113 knots, which was also good. The touchdown rate was smooth at -127 feet per minute.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 2 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 2 knots at a direction of 349 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 2 knots and a tailwind of 1 knot. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by
The aircraft in question, an RJ85, successfully landed at Geneva Cointrin International Airport (LSGG) with a score of 99.3%. The final approach was initiated from the north-east, heading 225.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,235 feet above ground level (agl).
Upon landing on runway 22, which has a length of 3,570 meters, the aircraft demonstrated good threshold height and threshold speed, reaching 124 knots. The touchdown distance was also satisfactory at 463 meters, and the touchdown speed was maintained at 113 knots, indicating a smooth and controlled descent. The touchdown rate was particularly impressive, with a rate of -127 feet per minute (fpm), showcasing the pilot's skill in managing the aircraft's descent.
However, there was a slight deviation in the runway touchdown position, with the aircraft landing 4.3 meters off-centerline. This minor misalignment was likely due to factors such as wind or pilot error, but it did not significantly impact the overall performance of the landing.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were relatively calm, with a temperature of 2°C and a wind speed of 2 knots from 349°. The crosswind component was minimal at 2 knots, and the tailwind component was even weaker at 1 knot. These conditions likely contributed to the smooth and controlled nature of the landing.
The total landing distance was 1,011 meters, which is approximately 28% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating that the aircraft was well-handled and the pilot was able to bring it to a stop quickly and efficiently. The runway rollout alignment was also very good, demonstrating the pilot's ability to maintain control of the aircraft during the critical phase of landing.
Overall, the landing was a success, with the aircraft demonstrating good performance and control throughout the approach and touchdown phases. The minor deviation in touchdown position was the only notable issue, but it did not significantly impact the overall score.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values