Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Arrival
Nothing to change in the speed, the height or the flare. Keep the landing attitude held until the mains are on, so the aircraft is not let down onto the runway in the last moment.
What happened: The touchdown rate was 216 fpm. Nothing before it explains that: threshold speed and height were within limits and the flare was flown normally.
Watch for: Touchdown rate: a little less than 216 fpm next time
There are several things that can go wrong during the flare, carrying too much speed over the threshold, starting the flare at the wrong height and inconsistent flight control inputs, all contribute to a poor flare resulting in a hard touchdown or a float down the runway.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 16 stages, 15 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,692 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 506 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Paris-Orly Airport, the Boeing 737-800 began its journey on runway 07, accelerating to a liftoff speed of 147 kt after a takeoff distance of 1,162 m, which covered 40% of the runway. The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 26 °C, a wind speed of 2 kt at 90°, resulting in a negligible crosswind and a headwind of 1 kt.
As the aircraft climbed to its enroute cruise altitude, it passed overhead Villeneuve-le-Roi, France, and continued to ascend to 39,016 ft asl, a gain of 37,749 ft in 45 minutes, covering 352 nm. The enroute level cruise phase started 4 miles south east of Elmen, Austria, and lasted 140 minutes, during which the aircraft covered 1,106 nm. The descent phase began 17 miles south east of Kastelorizo Airport, Greece, and continued to 2,502 ft asl, a decrease of 36,496 ft in 22 minutes, covering 158 nm. The final approach to Paphos International Airport was initiated from the east, with a heading of 290.0° at 4 nm and 1,275 ft agl.
The Boeing 737-800 landed on runway 29 at Paphos International Airport, with a touchdown point 89 m beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed was slightly above the target at 138 kt, but the touchdown rate was good at -163 fpm. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, and the runway rollout alignment was also satisfactory. The total landing distance was 1,153 m, covering 43% of the runway. The aircraft taxied to the parking area in 1 minute, covering less than 1 nm. The total flight distance was 1,635 nm, taking 216 minutes, and the aircraft used 9,693 kg of fuel.
The Boeing 737-800 touched down on runway 29 at LCPH Paphos International Airport with a satisfactory approach quality, despite a slightly above-target threshold speed of 138 kt. The aircraft maintained a good threshold height, allowing for a smooth transition into the touchdown phase. At 127 kt, the touchdown speed was a little fast, but the touchdown rate of -163 fpm was within acceptable limits.
The aircraft's centreline alignment during the rollout phase was very good, indicating a high degree of control and precision during the landing. The touchdown point was 89 m beyond the touchdown zone, which, although not ideal, did not compromise the overall safety of the landing. The total landing distance of 1,153 m, accounting for 43% of the runway length, was within the acceptable range for a Boeing 737-800.
The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 24 °C and a gentle headwind of 1 kt, contributed to a relatively straightforward landing. The crosswind component of 3 kt was minimal, and the aircraft's handling characteristics were not significantly affected. Overall, the landing was scored 99.2%, reflecting a high level of proficiency and control throughout the approach, touchdown, and rollout phases.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values