MY FS FLIGHTS
Replay this flight in 3D — the full flight path over the terrain with every stage, event and score along the route.
Departure roll runway 10 at LSZR Altenrhein. Takeoff distance 133 m 10 % of runway. Liftoff speed was 70 kn. Local weather - Temperature 16 °C. Wind 1 kn at 270 °. Crosswind: 0 kn Tailwind: 1 kn.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Takeoff distance 133 m 10 % of runway |
|||
| 100 % |
Liftoff speed was 70 kn Target 70 kn |
|||
| 89.86 % |
Runway alignment max 5.83 m 0.00 m left to 5.83 m right |
-5.10 | -5.04 m | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.99 g min to max 1.03 g |
1.00 | 1.03 g | |
| 100 % |
Takeoff Bounce |
|||
| Info |
Average pitch angle 1.4 ° 1.0 ° min to max 3.0 ° |
1.2 | 3.0 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.1 ° 0.0 ° min to max 0.3 ° |
0.3 | 0.3 ° | |
| Info |
Battery Master On at 22:13:32 |
|||
| Info |
Engine 1 Started at 22:13:32 |
|||
| Info |
Beacon Lights Switched On at 22:13:32 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 1 at 22:13:32 |
|||
| 0 % |
Landing Lights at 22:13:32 |
|||
| 0 % |
Strobe Lights at 22:13:32 |
Departure climb to 50 ft agl from runway 10 LSZR Altenrhein.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Heading variation 0.2 ° 0.1 ° min to max 0.3 ° |
0.3 | 0.1 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 74 kn 70 kn min to max 77 kn |
70 | 77 kn | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 0.9 ° 0.0 ° min to max 2.0 ° |
0.3 | 0.5 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.06 g 1.00 g min to max 1.14 g |
1.04 | 1.01 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI 551 ft/m 362 ft/m min to max 658 ft/m |
362 | 658 ft/m | |
| Info |
Average altitude 18 ft agl 0 ft agl min to max 45 ft agl |
0 | 45 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 6.4 ° 3.2 ° min to max 7.4 ° |
3.2 | 7.4 ° |
Departure climb to 400 ft agl from 10 LSZR Altenrhein.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Heading variation -0.1 ° -1.2 ° min to max 0.1 ° |
0.1 | -1.2 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 78 kn 75 kn min to max 80 kn |
77 | 79 kn | |
| 96.32 % |
Average bank angle 0.9 ° 0.0 ° min to max 3.4 ° |
0.5 | 1.0 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.02 g 0.86 g min to max 1.05 g |
1.01 | 1.04 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI 838 ft/m 661 ft/m min to max 1,254 ft/m |
661 | 1,163 ft/m | |
| Info |
Average altitude 116 ft agl 45 ft agl min to max 389 ft agl |
45 | 389 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 8.9 ° 7.4 ° min to max 13.4 ° |
7.4 | 13.4 ° | |
| Info |
Flaps Fully Retracted at 22:13:51 |
Departure climb to 1,000 ft agl from 10 LSZR Altenrhein.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Heading variation -1.8 ° -2.2 ° min to max -1.5 ° |
-1.5 | -2.2 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 76 kn 75 kn min to max 78 kn |
78 | 75 kn | |
| 53.63 % |
Average bank angle 11.6 ° 3.2 ° min to max 19.6 ° |
3.2 | 19.6 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 0.99 g 0.97 g min to max 1.02 g |
1.02 | 0.97 g | |
| 100 % |
Landing gear up |
|||
| Info |
Average VSI 1,339 ft/m 1,271 ft/m min to max 1,393 ft/m |
1,271 | 1,281 ft/m | |
| Info |
Average altitude 469 ft agl 411 ft agl min to max 524 ft agl |
411 | 524 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 14.4 ° 13.8 ° min to max 14.7 ° |
14.1 | 13.8 ° |
Enroute climb started overhead LSZR Altenrhein St Gallen (Kanton St. Gallen, Switzerland). Climbing from 1,852 ft asl to 3,320 ft asl, an increase of 1,468 ft in 2 minutes and covering 2 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average speed 83 kn 70 kn min to max 94 kn |
74 | 74 kn | |
| 91.12 % |
Average bank angle 10.5 ° 0.0 ° min to max 44.4 ° |
23.0 | 44.4 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.02 g 0.87 g min to max 1.31 g |
0.97 | 1.05 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI 714 ft/m -485 ft/m min to max 1,378 ft/m |
1,184 | -462 ft/m | |
| Info |
Average altitude 2,688 ft asl 1,852 ft asl min to max 3,388 ft asl |
1,852 | 3,320 ft asl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 7.8 ° -2.0 ° min to max 13.3 ° |
13.0 | -2.0 ° | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 | |
| Info |
Flaps Position 1 at 22:15:43 |
Enroute descent started 1 mile north east of Rorschach (Kanton St. Gallen, Switzerland). Descent from 3,302 ft asl to 2,096 ft asl, a decrease of 1,206 ft in 2 minutes and covering 1 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average speed 86 kn 76 kn min to max 101 kn |
76 | 88 kn | |
| 89.68 % |
Average bank angle 13.8 ° 0.1 ° min to max 45.2 ° |
45.2 | 33.6 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.05 g 0.91 g min to max 1.29 g |
1.04 | 1.06 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -564 ft/m -2,404 ft/m min to max 338 ft/m |
-868 | -896 ft/m | |
| Info |
Average altitude 2,647 ft asl 2,096 ft asl min to max 3,302 ft asl |
3,302 | 2,096 ft asl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -2.4 ° -13.0 ° min to max 3.7 ° |
-5.7 | -4.0 ° | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 | |
| Info |
Flaps Fully Retracted at 22:17:39 |
Enroute level cruise started overhead Rorschach (Kanton St. Gallen, Switzerland) and lasted 1 minutes, covering less than 1 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average altitude 1,930 ft asl 1,846 ft asl min to max 2,076 ft asl |
2,076 | 1,846 ft asl | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 87 kn 80 kn min to max 93 kn |
89 | 80 kn | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 5.3 ° 0.0 ° min to max 30.3 ° |
30.3 | 10.7 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.03 g 0.95 g min to max 1.15 g |
1.04 | 1.04 g | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 1.7 ° -5.9 ° min to max 3.5 ° |
-5.6 | 2.6 ° |
Arrival started overhead Rorschach (Kanton St. Gallen, Switzerland).
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average speed 76 kn 73 kn min to max 79 kn |
79 | 76 kn | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 2.9 ° 0.1 ° min to max 9.4 ° |
9.4 | 1.6 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.92 g min to max 1.11 g |
1.06 | 1.07 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -363 ft/m -647 ft/m min to max -19 ft/m |
-322 | -485 ft/m | |
| Info |
Average altitude 1,784 ft asl 1,706 ft asl min to max 1,841 ft asl |
1,841 | 1,706 ft asl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 1.2 ° -2.0 ° min to max 3.6 ° |
3.4 | 0.5 ° | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 | |
| Info |
Flaps Position 1 at 22:19:25 |
Approaching runway 10 at LSZR Altenrhein from 1 nm to 0 nm. Descent from 394 ft agl to 47 ft agl. A decrease of 348 ft in 35 seconds.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 64.8 % |
Approach angle 3.3 ° 2.7 ° min to max 3.8 ° Target 3.0 ° |
3.7 | 2.7 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 80 kn 76 kn min to max 82 kn |
76 | 79 kn | |
| 100 % |
Heading variation -0.1 ° -0.4 ° min to max 0.3 ° |
0.0 | -0.4 ° | |
| 82.55 % |
Average bank angle 5.1 ° 0.0 ° min to max 9.5 ° |
1.2 | 7.6 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 0.99 g 0.95 g min to max 1.06 g |
1.00 | 1.01 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -600 ft/m -747 ft/m min to max -380 ft/m |
-409 | -703 ft/m | |
| Info |
Average altitude 128 ft agl 47 ft agl min to max 394 ft agl |
394 | 47 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -2.1 ° -3.2 ° min to max 0.2 ° |
0.2 | -2.4 ° |
Landing on runway 10 at LSZR Altenrhein, runway length 1,322 m. Good threshold height. Threshold speed was slightly above target at 79 kn.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Threshold speed was slightly above target at 79 kn. Target 75 kn |
|||
| 100 % |
Target 50 ft agl |
|||
| 84.67 % |
Landing and flare profile |
|||
| 100 % |
Heading variation -0.1 ° -0.4 ° min to max 0.0 ° |
-0.4 | -0.1 ° | |
| 85.82 % |
Average bank angle 2.9 ° 0.0 ° min to max 7.4 ° |
7.4 | 1.5 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.02 g 0.91 g min to max 1.21 g |
1.01 | 0.99 g | |
| Info |
Average speed 70 kn 61 kn min to max 79 kn |
79 | 61 kn | |
| Info |
Average VSI -212 ft/m -712 ft/m min to max 46 ft/m |
-704 | -173 ft/m | |
| Info |
Average altitude 18 ft agl 6 ft agl min to max 45 ft agl |
45 | 6 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 3.2 ° -2.4 ° min to max 6.9 ° |
-2.4 | 4.9 ° |
Touchdown point was very long using more than 50% of available runway. Touchdown speed at 61 kn was a little fast. Touchdown rate was good at -173 ft/m. Runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.9 m from centreline. Local weather - Temperature 16 °C. Wind 1 kn at 270 °. Crosswind: 0 kn Tailwind: 1 kn.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 97.49 % |
Touchdown VSI was -173 ft/m. |
|||
| 100 % |
Touchdown distance was 487 m Target 457 m |
|||
| 100 % |
Speed at touchdown 61 kn Target 57 kn |
|||
| 96.99 % |
Runway alignment max 4.72 m 1.66 m left |
-0.85 | 3.87 m | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 0.9 ° 0.0 ° min to max 1.7 ° |
1.5 | 0.8 ° | |
| 94.57 % |
Average g force 1.01 g 0.50 g min to max 1.69 g |
0.99 | 1.37 g | |
| 100 % |
Landing Bounce |
|||
| Info |
Average speed 55 kn 49 kn min to max 61 kn |
61 | 49 kn | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 4.2 ° -8.9 ° min to max 12.9 ° |
4.9 | 8.4 ° | |
| Info |
Stall Warning Activated at 22:20:31 |
|||
| Info |
Stall Warning Deactivated at 22:20:32 |
|||
| Info |
Stall Warning Activated at 22:20:35 |
|||
| Info |
Stall Warning Deactivated at 22:20:36 |
|||
| Info |
Stall Warning Activated at 22:20:37 |
|||
| Info |
Stall Warning Deactivated at 22:20:38 |
|||
| Info |
Stall Warning Activated at 22:20:39 |
|||
| Info |
Stall Warning Deactivated at 22:20:40 |
Total landing distance 1,280 m, 97 % of runway. Runway rollout alignment was very good.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 12.45 % |
Landing distance 1,280 m 97 % of runway. |
|||
| 92.01 % |
Runway alignment max 9.56 m 4.32 m left to 5.24 m right |
3.90 | -5.24 m | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 0.99 g 0.66 g min to max 1.30 g |
1.30 | 1.01 g | |
| Info |
Average speed 47 kn 32 kn min to max 51 kn |
51 | 32 kn | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 2.1 ° -4.0 ° min to max 10.6 ° |
9.2 | 1.2 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.3 ° 0.0 ° min to max 1.6 ° |
0.9 | 0.1 ° |
Exiting runway, average speed 14 kn
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| Info |
Average speed 15 kn 6 kn min to max 27 kn |
27 | 19 kn | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 1.8 ° 1.2 ° min to max 2.3 ° |
1.2 | 1.8 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.1 ° 0.0 ° min to max 0.4 ° |
0.2 | 0.1 ° | |
| Info |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.99 g min to max 1.01 g |
1.00 | 1.00 g |
Taxiing to the parking from the runway took 5 minutes and covered less than 1 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average speed 12 kn 0 kn min to max 19 kn |
19 | 0 kn | |
| 100 % |
Average speed turning corners 11 kn max 11 kn |
0 | 0 kn | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.99 g min to max 1.01 g |
1.00 | 1.00 g | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 1.9 ° 1.3 ° min to max 2.1 ° |
1.9 | 1.9 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.1 ° 0.0 ° min to max 0.3 ° |
0.0 | 0.0 ° | |
| Info |
Engine 1 Stopped at 22:26:46 |
|||
| Info |
Battery Master Off at 22:26:47 |
|||
| 0 % |
Taxi Lights at 22:23:15 |
First and foremost, it is important to acknowledge the positive aspects of the aircraft landing score, which was a commendable 84.9%. This demonstrates that overall, the pilot exhibited a good level of competency during the landing process.
Upon closer examination, it is clear that there were certain areas that could be improved in order to achieve a higher score in future landings. During the Approach Phase, it is noted that the descent path was above the glideslope limit and the speed was slightly above target. It is essential for the pilot to maintain a steady descent path within the glideslope limit and to adhere closely to the designated speed in order to ensure a smooth and safe landing.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is apparent that there were some areas for improvement. While the threshold height and landing flare were good, there were concerns regarding the bank angle stability during landing. It is crucial for the pilot to maintain proper bank angle control in order to ensure a stable and controlled landing.
In the Touchdown Phase, there were both positives and areas for improvement. The touchdown rate was good, but the speed was slightly above target. Additionally, the touchdown point was very long, utilizing more than 50% of the available runway, and the runway touchdown position was significantly off centerline. It is important for the pilot to work on achieving a more precise touchdown point and aligning with the centerline of the runway to ensure optimal landing conditions.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, it is noted that the runway alignment was 5.2 m off centerline. This demonstrates a need for improved alignment and centerline tracking during the rollout phase of the landing.
Overall, while there were certain areas that could be improved upon, it is important to recognize the positives in the landing score and to view this as an opportunity for growth and development. By focusing on precision, speed control, and alignment, the pilot can work towards achieving an even higher score in future landings. With dedication and practice, improvements can be made to master the art of a smooth and successful landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values