This flight was operated by an Airbus A321 aircraft, taking off from Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport (LHBP) in Budapest, Hungary. The enroute climb phase began immediately after departure, with the aircraft ascending from an initial altitude of 488 feet above sea level to 1,823 feet above sea level. This climb phase was completed in just 2 minutes, during which the aircraft covered a distance of 4 nautical miles.
Following the initial climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which lasted for 4 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. This phase allowed the aircraft to maintain a steady altitude and speed, preparing it for the final approach to the runway.
The final approach to runway 31R at LHBP was initiated from the south east, with the aircraft heading in a direction of 315.0 degrees. At a distance of 2 nautical miles from the runway, the aircraft was at an altitude of 490 feet above ground level. The landing was executed smoothly, with the aircraft touching down on the runway at a speed of 114 knots. Although the touchdown speed was a little fast, the touchdown rate was smooth at -121 feet per minute.
The landing distance covered by the aircraft was 1,432 meters, which accounted for 39% of the total runway length of 3,701 meters. The runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating that the aircraft was well under control during the landing phase. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 11 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 8 knots from a direction of 60 degrees. The crosswind component was 8 knots, while the tailwind component was 2 knots.
In terms of fuel consumption, the aircraft used a total of 267 kilograms of fuel during the flight, which covered a distance of 9 nautical miles and lasted for 8 minutes. Overall, the flight was executed smoothly, with the aircraft performing well during the various phases of flight.
Replay this flight in 3D — the full flight path over the terrain with every stage, event and score along the route.
Enroute climb started overhead LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport Budapest (Budapest, Hungary). Climbing from 488 ft asl to 1,823 ft asl, an increase of 1,335 ft in 2 minutes and covering 4 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average speed 175 kt 153 kt min to max 223 kt |
159 | 176 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 2.3 ° 0.0 ° min to max 6.3 ° |
6.3 | 0.6 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.06 g 0.77 g min to max 1.30 g |
1.30 | 1.00 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI 965 fpm -378 fpm min to max 3,181 fpm |
419 | 590 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 1,198 ft asl 488 ft asl min to max 1,849 ft asl |
488 | 1,823 ft asl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 6.1 ° 2.6 ° min to max 8.3 ° |
7.4 | 5.0 ° | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 | |
| Info |
Battery Master On at 21:30:48 |
|||
| Info |
Engine 1 Started at 21:30:48 |
|||
| Info |
Engine 2 Started at 21:30:48 |
|||
| Info |
Beacon Lights Switched On at 21:30:48 |
|||
| Info |
Navigation Lights Switched On at 21:30:48 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Gear Down at 21:30:48 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 3 at 21:30:48 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Gear Up at 21:30:51 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 2 at 21:30:58 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 1 at 21:31:03 |
Enroute level cruise started overhead Ullo (Pest megye, Hungary) and lasted 4 minutes, covering 2 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 90.34 % |
Average altitude 1,967 ft asl 949 ft asl min to max 2,346 ft asl |
1,833 | 949 ft asl | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 169 kt 122 kt min to max 236 kt |
176 | 122 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 9.5 ° 0.0 ° min to max 27.8 ° |
0.2 | 3.7 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.03 g 0.86 g min to max 1.19 g |
1.00 | 1.01 g | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 2.5 ° -1.8 ° min to max 6.6 ° |
5.0 | 1.1 ° | |
| Info |
Flaps Fully Retracted at 21:33:07 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 1 at 21:33:32 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Gear Down at 21:34:56 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 2 at 21:35:03 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 3 at 21:35:11 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 4 at 21:35:53 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 5 at 21:36:00 |
Approaching runway 31R at LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport from 2 nm to 1 nm. Descent from 490 ft agl to 306 ft agl. A decrease of 184 ft in 19 seconds.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Approach angle 2.9 ° 2.8 ° min to max 3.0 ° Target 3.0 ° |
2.8 | 3.0 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 121 kt 121 kt min to max 122 kt |
122 | 122 kt | |
| 100 % |
Heading variation 0.1 ° -0.2 ° min to max 0.6 ° |
0.6 | -0.2 ° | |
| 96.62 % |
Average bank angle 2.0 ° 0.1 ° min to max 4.2 ° |
4.2 | 1.9 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.96 g min to max 1.02 g |
1.01 | 0.96 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -552 fpm -631 fpm min to max -486 fpm |
-611 | -631 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 395 ft agl 306 ft agl min to max 490 ft agl |
490 | 306 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 1.5 ° 0.4 ° min to max 2.0 ° |
1.2 | 0.4 ° |
Approaching runway 31R at LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport from 1 nm to 0 nm. Descent from 294 ft agl to 37 ft agl. A decrease of 257 ft in 22 seconds.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Approach angle 2.7 ° 2.6 ° min to max 3.0 ° Target 3.0 ° |
3.0 | 2.8 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 121 kt 120 kt min to max 123 kt |
122 | 120 kt | |
| 100 % |
Heading variation 0.0 ° -0.1 ° min to max 0.1 ° |
-0.1 | 0.1 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 1.0 ° 0.0 ° min to max 2.4 ° |
2.4 | 1.1 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.01 g 0.95 g min to max 1.04 g |
0.98 | 1.00 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -608 fpm -793 fpm min to max -508 fpm |
-697 | -509 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 83 ft agl 37 ft agl min to max 294 ft agl |
294 | 37 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 1.8 ° 0.1 ° min to max 2.4 ° |
0.3 | 2.4 ° |
Landing on runway 31R at LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport, runway length 3,701 m. Good threshold height. Threshold speed was good at 120 kt.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Threshold speed was good at 120 kt. Target 116 kt |
|||
| 100 % |
Target 50 ft agl |
|||
| 88.77 % |
Landing and flare profile |
|||
| 100 % |
Heading variation 0.0 ° -0.0 ° min to max 0.1 ° |
0.1 | -0.0 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 0.8 ° 0.7 ° min to max 1.1 ° |
1.1 | 0.7 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.02 g 1.00 g min to max 1.05 g |
1.00 | 1.01 g | |
| Info |
Average speed 119 kt 114 kt min to max 120 kt |
120 | 114 kt | |
| Info |
Average VSI -292 fpm -510 fpm min to max -121 fpm |
-510 | -121 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 18 ft agl 4 ft agl min to max 41 ft agl |
41 | 4 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 4.2 ° 2.5 ° min to max 6.1 ° |
2.5 | 6.1 ° |
Touchdown point was 139 m beyond the touchdown zone. Touchdown speed at 114 kt was a little fast. Touchdown rate was smooth at -121 fpm. Runway touchdown alignment was perfect. Local weather - Temperature 11 °C. Wind 8 kt at 60 °. Crosswind: 8 kt Tailwind: 2 kt.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 99.27 % |
Touchdown VSI was -121 fpm. |
|||
| 88.77 % |
Touchdown distance was 560 m Target 457 m |
|||
| 100 % |
Speed at touchdown 114 kt Target below 114 kt |
|||
| 100 % |
Runway alignment max 1.28 m 0.88 m right |
-0.51 | -1.28 m | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 0.4 ° 0.1 ° min to max 0.7 ° |
0.7 | 0.2 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.11 g 1.01 g min to max 1.17 g |
1.01 | 1.09 g | |
| 100 % |
Landing Bounce |
|||
| Info |
Average speed 114 kt 113 kt min to max 114 kt |
114 | 113 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 6.2 ° 6.1 ° min to max 6.3 ° |
6.1 | 6.3 ° |
Total landing distance 1,432 m, 39 % of runway. Runway rollout alignment was very good.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Landing distance 1,432 m 39 % of runway. |
|||
| 96.5 % |
Runway alignment max 4.01 m 0.00 m left to 4.01 m right |
-1.35 | -0.56 m | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.96 g min to max 1.07 g |
1.07 | 0.99 g | |
| Info |
Average speed 106 kt 58 kt min to max 115 kt |
115 | 58 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 4.7 ° -0.2 ° min to max 6.8 ° |
6.4 | -0.2 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.4 ° 0.0 ° min to max 0.6 ° |
0.3 | 0.0 ° |
Exiting runway, average speed 33 kt
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| Info |
Average speed 34 kt 0 kt min to max 55 kt |
55 | 0 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -0.1 ° -0.6 ° min to max 0.3 ° |
-0.3 | -0.1 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.1 ° 0.0 ° min to max 0.2 ° |
0.0 | 0.1 ° | |
| Info |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.99 g min to max 1.01 g |
1.00 | 1.00 g | |
| Info |
Flaps Position 4 at 21:38:09 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 3 at 21:38:13 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 2 at 21:38:21 |
The Airbus A321 successfully landed at LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport, achieving a high score of 98.4%. The aircraft approached the runway from the south east, heading 315.0° at 2 nautical miles and 490 feet above ground level (agl). The final approach was executed smoothly, with a good threshold height and a threshold speed of 120 knots.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft landed 139 meters beyond the touchdown zone, which is slightly beyond the ideal spot. However, the touchdown speed of 114 knots was a bit faster than desired, indicating that the pilots may have needed to apply more braking force to slow down the aircraft. Despite this, the touchdown rate was smooth at -121 feet per minute (fpm), indicating a controlled descent.
The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, which is a testament to the pilots' skill and attention to detail. The local weather conditions were favorable, with a temperature of 11°C and a gentle wind of 8 knots at 60°. The crosswind component was 8 knots, while the tailwind component was a relatively minor 2 knots.
The total landing distance of 1,432 meters was 39% of the runway length, which is a relatively short distance considering the aircraft's size and weight. The runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating that the pilots maintained control of the aircraft during the rollout phase and were able to bring it to a stop safely.
Overall, the landing was a success, with the pilots demonstrating excellent skills and attention to detail. However, there is room for improvement in terms of touchdown speed and distance from the touchdown zone.
Drag to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values