Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Configure earlier
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 24 stages, 22 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with five checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: off the runway's 3.5° glideslope.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,891 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 342 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 11 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. The aircraft, a British Aerospace 146-300, then departed from runway 04R at Nice-Côte d'Azur Airport, located in France. The takeoff distance was 1,607 meters, which accounted for 54% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 127 knots.
As the aircraft climbed to a higher altitude, it encountered local weather conditions of 28°C temperature and a wind speed of 14 knots at 262°. The crosswind was 9 knots, while the tailwind was 11 knots. The enroute climb started 1 mile east of the airport and continued for 9 minutes, covering a distance of 29 nautical miles. The aircraft climbed from 672 feet above sea level to 15,879 feet, an increase of 15,207 feet.
The enroute level cruise started overhead Riva Ligure, Italy, and lasted for 62 minutes, covering less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft then began another climb, this time from 15,879 feet to 16,629 feet, an increase of 750 feet in 2 minutes. The enroute level cruise started again, this time overhead Pompeiana, Italy, and lasted for 25 minutes, covering less than 1 nautical mile.
The aircraft then began another climb, this time from 16,629 feet to 29,888 feet, an increase of 13,258 feet in 14 minutes. The enroute level cruise started again, this time 5 miles south east of Cabella Ligure, Italy, and lasted for 18 minutes, covering 128 nautical miles.
As the aircraft began its descent, it encountered a wind speed of 1 knot at 216°. The crosswind was 1 knot, while the headwind was 1 knot. The enroute descent started overhead Vervo, Italy, and continued for 12 minutes, covering 66 nautical miles. The aircraft descended from 29,419 feet to 9,473 feet, a decrease of 19,946 feet.
The enroute level cruise started again, this time overhead Stummerberg, Austria, and lasted for 5 minutes, covering 4 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final descent, this time from 9,555 feet to 2,806 feet, a decrease of 6,749 feet in 5 minutes. The final approach to runway 26 at Innsbruck Airport was from the east, heading 263.0° at 4 nautical miles and 898 feet above ground level.
The landing on runway 26 was successful, with a touchdown distance of 340 meters and a touchdown speed of 116 knots. The touchdown rate was fair at -208 feet per minute. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.4 meters from the centreline. The total landing distance was 1,131 meters, which accounted for 60% of the runway.
The runway rollout alignment was very good, and the taxiing to the parking from the runway took 5 minutes, covering less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 328 nautical miles, taking 76 minutes, and the aircraft used 2,486 kilograms of fuel.
The British Aerospace 146-300 aircraft successfully landed at Innsbruck Airport (LOWI) with a score of 97.8%. The final approach to runway 26 was initiated from the east, heading 263.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 898 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft's approach was characterized by a good threshold height, indicating that the pilots maintained a safe altitude prior to touchdown.
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down on the runway at a speed of 123 knots, which was within the acceptable threshold speed range. The touchdown distance of 340 meters was also within the expected parameters, demonstrating the pilots' ability to control the aircraft's descent and speed. However, the touchdown speed of 116 knots was slightly lower than the threshold speed, which may indicate a slight delay in the touchdown process.
The touchdown rate of -208 feet per minute (fpm) was considered fair, suggesting that the aircraft's descent was not as smooth as it could have been. This may be attributed to the pilots' attempt to maintain control and stability during the landing process. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.4 meters from the centerline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the pilots' alignment with the runway.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 15°C and a wind speed of 1 knot from 216°. The crosswind and headwind components were both 1 knot, indicating a relatively calm and stable environment. The total landing distance of 1,131 meters was 60% of the runway length, which is within the acceptable range. The runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating that the pilots maintained control and stability during the post-landing phase.
Overall, the landing was considered successful, with the aircraft touching down safely and the pilots demonstrating good control and stability throughout the process. However, there were some minor deviations in the touchdown speed and rate, as well as a slight misalignment with the runway centerline.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values