Departure
Arrival
The flight in question was operated by an Embraer E195 aircraft, taking off from Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport (LHBP) in Budapest, Hungary. The initial climb phase began as the aircraft lifted off from the airport, rising from an altitude of 480 feet above sea level to 1,474 feet in just one minute, covering a distance of six nautical miles.
Following the initial climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, maintaining a steady altitude as it flew over the Kobanya area in Budapest. This phase lasted for four minutes, during which the aircraft covered a distance of three nautical miles.
As the aircraft approached the final approach phase, it began its descent towards runway 13R at LHBP, flying from the north-west at a heading of 126.0 degrees. At an altitude of 519 feet above ground level and one nautical mile from the runway, the aircraft was in a good position to begin its landing.
The landing itself was successful, with the aircraft touching down on the runway at a speed of 132 knots and a distance of 399 meters. The touchdown rate was firm at -335 feet per minute, indicating a controlled descent. However, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned from the centreline by 6.9 meters.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were calm, with a temperature of 2 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 0 knots from a direction of 304 degrees. There was no crosswind or headwind to contend with.
The total landing distance was 1,974 meters, which accounted for 66% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating a smooth and controlled deceleration of the aircraft after touchdown.
In terms of fuel consumption, the flight used a total of -360 kilograms of fuel, covering a distance of 11 nautical miles in seven minutes. Overall, the flight was a successful and controlled operation, with the aircraft performing well in a variety of phases.
Replay this flight in 3D — the full flight path over the terrain with every stage, event and score along the route.
Enroute Climb
97.11 %
Enroute climb started overhead LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport Budapest (Budapest, Hungary). Climbing from 480 ft asl to 1,474 ft asl, an increase of 994 ft in 1 minutes and covering 6 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 92.76 % |
Average speed 207 kt 170 kt min to max 269 kt |
170 | 244 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 1.5 ° 0.0 ° min to max 12.2 ° |
0.9 | 1.9 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.03 g 0.88 g min to max 1.20 g |
1.00 | 1.16 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI 622 fpm -664 fpm min to max 2,422 fpm |
196 | 370 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 889 ft asl 480 ft asl min to max 1,581 ft asl |
480 | 1,474 ft asl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 5.8 ° 1.1 ° min to max 9.4 ° |
6.1 | 5.0 ° | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 | |
| Info |
Landing Gear Up at 16:53:37 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Fully Retracted at 16:53:54 |
|||
| Info |
Autopilot Heading Hold Activated at 16:54:08 |
|||
| Info |
Exceeded 250 kn below 10000 ft at 16:54:15 |
Enroute Level
99.47 %
Enroute level cruise started overhead Kobanya (Budapest, Hungary) and lasted 4 minutes, covering 3 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 98.24 % |
Average altitude 1,634 ft asl 982 ft asl min to max 2,176 ft asl |
1,488 | 982 ft asl | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 184 kt 135 kt min to max 244 kt |
244 | 145 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 11.3 ° 0.1 ° min to max 31.8 ° |
2.9 | 1.7 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.04 g 0.87 g min to max 1.29 g |
1.17 | 0.95 g | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 4.3 ° -1.8 ° min to max 8.5 ° |
5.6 | 3.2 ° | |
| Info |
Flaps Position 2 at 16:55:42 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Gear Down at 16:57:30 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 3 at 16:57:33 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 4 at 16:57:51 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 5 at 16:57:53 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 6 at 16:57:55 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 5 at 16:57:56 |
|||
| Info |
GPWS Warning Activated at 16:58:19 |
|||
| Info |
GPWS Warning Deactivated at 16:58:37 |
Arrival Final 2
98.84 %
Approaching runway 13R at LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport from 2 nm to 1 nm. Descent from 519 ft agl to 373 ft agl. A decrease of 146 ft in 10 seconds.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Approach angle 3.4 ° 3.4 ° min to max 3.5 ° Target 3.0 ° |
3.4 | 3.5 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 145 kt 144 kt min to max 145 kt |
145 | 144 kt | |
| 100 % |
Heading variation -0.4 ° -1.0 ° min to max 0.1 ° |
-1.0 | 0.1 ° | |
| 94.19 % |
Average bank angle 4.5 ° 3.6 ° min to max 5.2 ° |
5.2 | 3.6 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.96 g min to max 1.05 g |
1.00 | 0.99 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -871 fpm -971 fpm min to max -778 fpm |
-823 | -781 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 443 ft agl 373 ft agl min to max 519 ft agl |
519 | 373 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 3.6 ° 2.8 ° min to max 4.3 ° |
3.7 | 3.9 ° |
Arrival Final 1
100 %
Approaching runway 13R at LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport from 1 nm to 0 nm. Descent from 359 ft agl to 52 ft agl. A decrease of 307 ft in 19 seconds.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Approach angle 3.6 ° 3.5 ° min to max 3.8 ° Target 3.0 ° |
3.5 | 3.5 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 141 kt 139 kt min to max 144 kt |
144 | 139 kt | |
| 100 % |
Heading variation 0.3 ° 0.2 ° min to max 0.5 ° |
0.2 | 0.3 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 0.8 ° 0.0 ° min to max 2.4 ° |
1.5 | 0.0 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.01 g 0.90 g min to max 1.07 g |
0.97 | 1.07 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -1,004 fpm -1,084 fpm min to max -727 fpm |
-797 | -1,039 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 121 ft agl 52 ft agl min to max 359 ft agl |
359 | 52 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 4.2 ° 2.4 ° min to max 6.2 ° |
3.3 | 6.2 ° |
Arrival Landing
97.16 %
Landing on runway 13R at LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport, runway length 3,006 m. Good threshold height. Threshold speed was slightly above target at 139 kt.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Threshold speed was slightly above target at 139 kt. Target 130 kt |
|||
| 100 % |
Target 50 ft agl |
|||
| 88.63 % |
Landing and flare profile |
|||
| 100 % |
Heading variation 0.2 ° 0.2 ° min to max 0.3 ° |
0.3 | 0.2 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 1.1 ° 0.0 ° min to max 1.4 ° |
0.0 | 1.1 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.06 g 1.01 g min to max 1.12 g |
1.10 | 1.01 g | |
| Info |
Average speed 136 kt 132 kt min to max 139 kt |
139 | 132 kt | |
| Info |
Average VSI -616 fpm -1,017 fpm min to max -335 fpm |
-1,017 | -335 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 10 ft agl -8 ft agl min to max 37 ft agl |
37 | -8 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 7.9 ° 6.6 ° min to max 9.0 ° |
6.6 | 9.0 ° |
Arrival Touchdown
95.87 %
Touchdown distance was good at 399 m. Touchdown speed at 132 kt was good. Touchdown rate was firm at -335 fpm. Runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 6.9 m from centreline. Local weather - Temperature 2 °C. Wind 0 kt at 304 °. Crosswind: 0 kt Headwind: 0 kt.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 91.89 % |
Touchdown VSI was -335 fpm. |
|||
| 100 % |
Touchdown distance was 399 m Target 457 m |
|||
| 100 % |
Speed at touchdown 132 kt Target below 139 kt |
|||
| 86.02 % |
Runway alignment max 6.88 m 6.59 m left |
6.88 | 6.29 m | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 1.0 ° 0.6 ° min to max 1.3 ° |
1.1 | 0.6 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.16 g 1.01 g min to max 1.25 g |
1.01 | 1.15 g | |
| 100 % |
Landing Bounce |
|||
| Info |
Average speed 132 kt 132 kt min to max 132 kt |
132 | 132 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 8.9 ° 8.8 ° min to max 9.0 ° |
9.0 | 8.8 ° |
Arrival Rollout
94.78 %
Total landing distance 1,974 m, 66 % of runway. Runway rollout alignment was very good.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Landing distance 1,974 m 66 % of runway. |
|||
| 88.39 % |
Runway alignment max 6.23 m 6.23 m left to 0.00 m left |
6.23 | 4.63 m | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.97 g min to max 1.12 g |
1.12 | 1.00 g | |
| Info |
Average speed 120 kt 69 kt min to max 135 kt |
135 | 69 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 4.0 ° -1.3 ° min to max 8.7 ° |
8.7 | -1.2 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.3 ° 0.0 ° min to max 0.8 ° |
0.4 | 0.3 ° | |
| Info |
Autopilot Heading Hold Deactivated at 16:59:34 |
Runway Exit
Exiting runway, average speed 29 kt
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| Info |
Average speed 29 kt 2 kt min to max 58 kt |
58 | 2 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -1.2 ° -1.3 ° min to max -1.0 ° |
-1.1 | -1.1 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.2 ° 0.1 ° min to max 0.3 ° |
0.2 | 0.1 ° | |
| Info |
Average g force 0.99 g 0.98 g min to max 1.00 g |
0.99 | 1.00 g |
The aircraft in question, an E195, successfully landed at LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport on runway 13R. The final approach was initiated from the north-west, heading 126.0° at an altitude of 519 feet above ground level (agl) and 1 nautical mile from the runway. The aircraft maintained a steady course throughout the approach, ultimately touching down on the runway with a speed of 132 knots, which was within the acceptable range.
The touchdown distance of 399 meters was considered good, indicating that the pilot had effectively managed the aircraft's descent and speed. The touchdown rate of -335 feet per minute (fpm) was also firm, suggesting that the pilot had maintained control of the aircraft during the landing. However, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 6.9 meters from the centerline, which may require some adjustments to the pilot's approach technique.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were relatively calm, with a temperature of 2°C and a wind speed of 0 knots from 304°. This resulted in a crosswind and headwind of 0 knots, making the landing conditions ideal. The total landing distance of 1,974 meters was 66% of the runway length, which is a reasonable distance considering the aircraft's size and the runway's length of 3,006 meters.
The runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating that the pilot had effectively controlled the aircraft's speed and direction during the rollout phase. Overall, the landing was considered successful, with the aircraft touching down safely and the pilot maintaining control throughout the rollout. The score of 97.0% suggests that the landing was nearly flawless, with only minor deviations from the ideal approach and landing technique.
Drag to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values