Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Maintain the centreline
A small uncorrected heading error at 40 knots becomes a metre of offset per second by 100 knots, noticed only at rotation, producing a crabbed liftoff. Root cause is nearly always eyes on the tape instead of the far end of the runway. Small heading changes displace a distant point visibly long before the nearby centreline stripes look wrong.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 19 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,132 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 302 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight in the Tecnam P2006T MKII started with a departure roll from runway 12 at LIPE Borgo Panigale, with a takeoff distance of 253 meters, which was 12% of the total runway length. The liftoff speed was 68 knots. The local weather at the time of departure was 15°C with a wind speed of 0 knots coming from 90°, resulting in no crosswind or headwind components.
The enroute climb began overhead LIPE Borgo Panigale Bologna, ascending from 854 feet above sea level to 5,009 feet above sea level, a total increase of 4,155 feet in 6 minutes and covering a distance of 10 nautical miles. The level cruise during this leg of the flight lasted for 13 minutes, covering 9 nautical miles.
Another enroute climb took place 1 mile north of Montalbano, with the aircraft climbing from 4,011 feet above sea level to 7,957 feet above sea level, an increase of 3,946 feet in 4 minutes and covering 7 nautical miles. The subsequent level cruise phase lasted for 4 minutes, covering less than 1 nautical mile.
The descent began 1 mile northeast of San Pietro in Casale, descending from 7,673 feet above sea level to 4,004 feet above sea level, a decrease of 3,668 feet in 4 minutes and covering 11 nautical miles. A level cruise followed, starting overhead Crevalcore and lasting 8 minutes, covering 8 nautical miles.
Finally, the landing was executed on runway 12 at LIPE Borgo Panigale, with a total landing distance of 458 meters, which was 21% of the runway length. The height at threshold was 33 feet above ground level, with a speed at threshold of 72 knots. The touchdown occurred 301 meters from the threshold, with a touchdown speed of 60 knots and a Vertical Speed Indicator reading of -82 feet per minute. The local weather at the time of landing was 15°C with a wind speed of 0 knots coming from 115°, resulting in no crosswind or headwind components.
Overall, the total flight distance covered was 51 nautical miles, with a total flight time of 50 minutes and fuel consumption of 23 kilograms.
First of all, congratulations on achieving an impressive aircraft landing score of 99.0%! This is an outstanding accomplishment and reflects the hard work and dedication that went into executing a near-perfect landing.
Let's break down the different phases of the landing and analyze the strengths and areas for improvement:
During the Approach Phase, it is noted that there was a poor descent path above the glideslope limit. This indicates that the aircraft may have approached the runway at a steeper angle than optimal, which can result in a less smooth and controlled descent. To improve this phase, focus on maintaining a steady descent rate and staying within the glideslope limits for a more precise approach.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is great to see that there was a good threshold height and a perfect landing flare. These aspects are crucial for ensuring a smooth touchdown and minimizing the risk of a hard landing. Keep up the good work in maintaining proper altitude and executing the landing flare effectively.
In the Touchdown Phase, it is highlighted that the touchdown rate was excellent, the speed was on target, and the touchdown distance was inside the touchdown zone. Additionally, the runway touchdown position was very good. These are all key indicators of a well-executed touchdown, demonstrating good control and precision. Continue to focus on maintaining proper speed and alignment during this phase.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, it is mentioned that the runway alignment was very good. This is important for ensuring a straight and smooth rollout after touchdown. Consistent alignment with the runway centerline helps in maintaining control and stability during the landing rollout.
Overall, your landing performance shows a high level of skill and proficiency. By addressing the areas for improvement in the Approach Phase and continuing to excel in the Landing, Touchdown, and Rollout Phases, you are well on your way to achieving even higher scores in the future. Keep up the excellent work and keep striving for excellence in all aspects of your aircraft landings. Great job!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values