Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Smooth the climb
A good takeoff has a defined shape. It also has a defined end. For an airliner that's thrust reduction and acceleration, commonly somewhere around 1,000 to 1,500 ft above the airfield depending on the operator, while for a light aircraft it's established at Vy with the flaps on schedule. Most simmers have no defined end to their takeoff, which is exactly why it never gets judged.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 16 stages, 15 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,651 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 75 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The 3.97 G arrival is the firm side of smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight in the Cessna Skyhawk began with a departure roll on runway 23 at LFKA Albertville General Pierre Delachenal Airfield. The takeoff distance was 443 meters, which equated to 64% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 63 knots. The local weather at the time of departure was 15°C with no significant wind, showing 0 knots at 0 degrees for both crosswind and headwind components.
The enroute climb started one mile southeast of Montailleur in Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes, France. The aircraft climbed from 2,006 feet above sea level to 3,384 feet above sea level, gaining 1,379 feet in altitude over a distance of 4 nautical miles. This climb took 2 minutes to complete.
Once at cruising altitude, the aircraft leveled off overhead Chamousset in Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes, France. The level cruise lasted for 6 minutes, covering a distance of 12 nautical miles.
The landing took place on runway 36 at LFLB Chambéry Savoie Mont Blanc Airport, with a runway length of 1,651 meters. The aircraft approached the runway with a height of 23 feet above ground level and at a speed of 46 knots. The touchdown occurred 73 meters from the threshold, with a touchdown speed of 41 knots and a vertical speed indicator reading of -373 feet per minute. The local weather at the time of landing was 16°C with calm wind conditions.
The total landing distance was 270 meters, which accounted for 16% of the runway length. After landing, taxiing from the runway to the parking area took less than 1 minute and covered less than 1 nautical mile.
Overall, the total flight distance covered was 27 nautical miles, with a total flight time of 26 minutes. The aircraft consumed 7 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 92.9% indicates a solid performance during the landing process. Let's break down the various phases of the landing to provide a more detailed analysis.
Starting with the Approach Phase, the pilot demonstrated excellent skill in maintaining the glideslope alignment, ensuring a smooth descent towards the runway. However, there was a notable issue with heading alignment, suggesting that the aircraft may have drifted off course slightly. Additionally, the speed was well below the target, which could potentially lead to a stall if not corrected. It is important for the pilot to closely monitor the speed and make adjustments as necessary to ensure a safe landing.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, the pilot did well in terms of threshold height and executed a very good landing flare. This indicates good judgment and control during the final approach and touchdown. Despite these positive aspects, the touchdown rate was noted as hard, suggesting that the landing may have been somewhat rough. It is important for the pilot to aim for a smoother touchdown to ensure passenger comfort and reduce wear and tear on the aircraft.
In the Touchdown Phase, the speed was on target, and the touchdown distance was inside the designated zone, both of which are positive indicators of a controlled landing. However, the runway touchdown position was slightly off-center at 5.6 meters from the centerline. It is crucial for the pilot to work on improving their alignment to ensure a more accurate touchdown in future landings.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was off by 4.6 meters from the centerline. Maintaining a straight path during rollout is essential for safe taxiing and can help prevent runway incursions. The pilot should focus on improving their alignment during this phase to enhance overall landing performance.
In conclusion, while there were several areas for improvement identified in the landing analysis, the overall score of 92.9% indicates a strong performance. By addressing the specific areas of concern, such as heading alignment, touchdown rate, and runway alignment, the pilot can work towards achieving even higher landing scores in the future. With continued practice and attention to detail, the pilot can further enhance their skills and ensure safe and smooth landings in all conditions.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values