Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Be on speed by the gate
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 15 stages, 13 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 1,000 ft gate: gear still up and speed 137 kt FAST on the reference speed of 120 kt.
At the 500 ft gate: speed 71 kt FAST on the reference speed of 120 kt.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 4,997 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the full 4,997 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 789 ft touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Leesburg International Airport (KLEE), the aircraft initiated its takeoff roll on runway 04. The takeoff distance of 2,351 feet, accounting for 51% of the runway, was successfully achieved, with a liftoff speed of 134 knots. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 60°F and a gentle wind of 2 knots at 270°, contributed to a smooth departure.
As the aircraft climbed to its enroute altitude, it passed overhead Silver Lake, Florida, and continued its ascent to 25,008 feet above sea level. The climb phase, which lasted 10 minutes and covered 60 nautical miles, resulted in a significant increase of 23,868 feet. Subsequently, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 4 miles north of Gainesville Regional Airport (KGNV) and lasted 33 minutes, covering 271 nautical miles. The descent phase began 2 miles north of Mableton, Georgia, and lasted 13 minutes, during which the aircraft descended from 24,735 feet to 1,968 feet above sea level, covering 73 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 33 at Chattanooga Metropolitan Airport (KCHA) was initiated from the southeast, with a heading of 325.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,268 feet above ground level. The landing was executed on a runway length of 4,892 feet, with a threshold speed of 114 knots and a touchdown speed of 109 knots. However, the touchdown rate was hard at -404 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown position was significantly misaligned by 63 feet from the centerline. The total landing distance of 2,712 feet, accounting for 55% of the runway, was achieved, and the runway rollout alignment was misaligned by 81 feet from the centerline. Following a brief taxiing period, the aircraft arrived at the parking area, having completed a total flight distance of 411 nautical miles, using 6,442 pounds of fuel in the process, and taking a total of 64 minutes.
The aircraft, C750, successfully executed a final approach to runway 33 at KCHA Chattanooga Metropolitan Airport (Lovell Field) from the south east, aligning with the runway at 4 nm and 1,268 ft above ground level. The approach quality was satisfactory, with a good threshold height and threshold speed of 114 kt, indicating a well-controlled descent. However, the touchdown speed of 109 kt was slightly above the optimal range, resulting in a hard touchdown rate of -404 fpm.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's distance of 784 ft was within acceptable limits, but the runway touchdown position was significantly misaligned by 63 ft from the centreline. This deviation from the centreline was also evident during the rollout phase, with the aircraft deviating by 81 ft from the centreline. The total landing distance of 2,712 ft, accounting for 55% of the runway length, was within the acceptable range.
The landing was completed under local weather conditions of 59 °F temperature and a light wind of 2 kt at 270 °, with a negligible crosswind and headwind component. Despite some deviations from optimal performance, the overall score for the landing was 86.2%, indicating a satisfactory execution of the landing procedure.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values