Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Arrival
Hold a little more back pressure through the last of the flare to arrest the sink before 300 fpm develops.
What happened: Touchdown sink rate was 300 fpm, a firm arrival with no other fault on this landing to account for it.
Watch for: Vertical speed indicator: minimal sink at touchdown
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 15 stages, 13 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed 66 kt FAST on the reference speed of 133 kt.
At the 500 ft gate: speed 40 kt FAST on the reference speed of 133 kt.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,590 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 519 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Hamburg Helmut Schmidt Airport (EDDH) served as the departure point for the Airbus A319, which taxiing from the parking area to the runway required 7 minutes and covered 1 nm. The aircraft rolled out on runway 33, taking off after a distance of 1,880 m, which represented 58 % of the available runway. Liftoff speed was 160 kt under local conditions of 31 °C, with a 14 kt wind from 50°, providing a 14 kt crosswind and a 3 kt headwind. The climb phase commenced 1 mile south of Norderstedt, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, where the aircraft ascended from 1,018 ft asl to 37,009 ft asl, an increase of 35,990 ft over 18 minutes while covering 111 nm. The cruise segment began overhead Arup, Region Syddanmark, Denmark, lasting 22 minutes and covering 153 nm before descent.
Descent began 6 miles southwest of Marstrand, Vaestra Goetaland County, Sweden, with the aircraft lowering from 36,989 ft asl to 1,982 ft asl, a decrease of 35,007 ft in 27 minutes and covering 147 nm. The final approach to runway 01L at Oslo Airport, Gardermoen (ENGM) was executed from the south, maintaining a heading of 15.0° at 4 nm and 1,292 ft agl. Landing on runway 01L, which measures 3,595 m, the threshold height at 64 ft agl was above target, and the threshold speed exceeded target at 144 kt. The touchdown point was 112 m beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 132 kt and a touchdown rate of –277 fpm. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.2 m from the centreline. Local weather at the time of landing was 19 °C with an 8 kt wind from 20°, providing a 1 kt crosswind and an 8 kt headwind. The total landing distance was 1,391 m, representing 39 % of the runway, and the runway rollout alignment was very good.
After touchdown, taxiing back to the parking area required 10 minutes and covered 1 nm. The entire flight covered a distance of 419 nm, took 80 minutes, and consumed 2,814 kg of fuel.
The final approach to runway 01L at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen was executed from the south with a heading of 15.0° at 4 nm and 1,292 ft AGL. The aircraft maintained a stable glide path, arriving at the threshold with a height of 64 ft AGL, slightly above the target, and a threshold speed of 144 kt, well above the desired value. The approach quality was consistent, with the aircraft aligned to the runway centerline and the wind conditions—8 kt from 20° with a 1 kt crosswind and an 8 kt headwind—providing a modest tailwind component that was effectively managed.
Touchdown occurred 112 m beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 132 kt, a little fast but within acceptable limits. The touchdown rate was fair at –277 fpm, and the aircraft was slightly misaligned from the centerline by 3.2 m. Despite these minor deviations, the touchdown characteristics were controlled, and the aircraft’s landing configuration was appropriate for the conditions. The touchdown point and speed were integrated smoothly into the rollout phase, ensuring a stable transition onto the runway surface.
During rollout, the aircraft covered a total landing distance of 1,391 m, representing 39 % of the 3,595 m runway length. The runway rollout alignment was very good, with the aircraft maintaining a straight path and minimal lateral drift. Overall, the landing performance achieved a score of 93.5 %, reflecting a high level of proficiency across all phases of the approach, touchdown, and rollout.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values