Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Use small, coordinated rudder and aileron inputs to hold your assigned climb heading as soon as drift begins.
What happened: During the second climb segment, you let the aircraft drift off the assigned heading.
Watch for: Heading indicator: steady on the assigned climb heading
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 16 stages, 15 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 500 ft gate: off the centreline.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,651 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 71 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a departure roll from runway 23 at LFKA Albertville General Pierre Delachenal Airfield. The aircraft, a Piper PA-24-250 Comanche, accelerated down the runway and lifted off at a speed of 73 kt, covering 290 m or 42% of the runway. The local weather conditions at the time of takeoff were characterized by a temperature of 16 °C and a wind speed of 1 kt from 270°, resulting in a negligible crosswind and headwind.
As the aircraft climbed away from the airfield, it began its enroute climb, which started overhead Sainte-Helene-sur-Isere. The climb was steep, with the aircraft ascending from 2,023 ft to 3,135 ft in just 2 minutes, covering a distance of 4 nm. This rapid ascent was followed by a level cruise, which began overhead Bourgneuf and lasted for 5 minutes, during which the aircraft covered a distance of 11 nm.
The enroute descent started overhead Myans, where the aircraft began its descent from 2,978 ft to 1,919 ft in 2 minutes, covering a distance of 6 nm. The final approach to runway 36 at LFLB Chambéry Savoie Mont Blanc Airport was made from the south, with the aircraft heading 348.0° at 3 nm and 1,148 ft above ground level.
The landing on runway 36 was smooth, with the aircraft touching down at a speed of 52 kt and a distance of 69 m. The touchdown rate was good at -171 fpm, and the runway touchdown alignment was very good. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 15 °C and a wind speed of 1 kt from 270°, resulting in a negligible crosswind and headwind.
The total landing distance was 1,142 m, which was 69% of the runway length. However, the runway rollout alignment was excessively misaligned by 113.7 m from the centreline. The taxiing to the parking from the runway took less than 1 minute and covered a distance of less than 1 nm.
The total flight distance was 25 nm, and the flight duration was 14 minutes. The aircraft used 10 kg of fuel during the flight. Overall, the flight was characterized by a smooth and controlled climb, cruise, and descent, with a good landing and a short taxiing time.
The Piper PA-24-250 Comanche aircraft successfully landed at LFLB Chambéry Savoie Mont Blanc Airport, achieving an impressive score of 86.0%. The final approach to runway 36 was conducted from the south, with the aircraft heading 348.0° at a distance of 3 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,148 feet above ground level.
The landing was executed smoothly, with the aircraft touching down on the runway at a speed of 52 knots, which was well below the target threshold speed. This was a crucial aspect of the landing, as it ensured that the aircraft did not stall. The touchdown distance of 69 meters was also good, indicating that the pilot had maintained control and precision throughout the approach.
The touchdown speed of 52 knots was also within the acceptable range, and the touchdown rate of -171 feet per minute was good, indicating a smooth and controlled descent. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, suggesting that the pilot had accurately lined up the aircraft with the runway.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were favorable, with a temperature of 15°C and a wind speed of 1 knot from 270°. This resulted in a negligible crosswind and headwind, making the landing even more challenging and impressive.
However, there was one area for improvement, which was the runway rollout alignment. The aircraft deviated from the centerline by 113.7 meters, which was excessively misaligned. This suggests that the pilot may have lost control or concentration during the rollout phase, resulting in a deviation from the desired path.
Overall, the landing was a success, with the aircraft touching down safely and smoothly on the runway. However, the pilot must work on maintaining control and alignment during the rollout phase to achieve a perfect score.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values