Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Arrival
Make small rudder corrections against a fixed point at the far end of the runway to hold the centreline.
What happened: You drifted off the centreline on the approach.
Watch for: Runway centreline: tracked all the way to the threshold.
See Arrival Approach
Below 10,000 ft you are typically limited to 250 kt indicated (a US rule that much of the world mirrors in some form, though not universally). This forces a deceleration around 10,000 ft whether the profile wants one or not, so plan for it rather than discovering it.
Read more in Descent PlanningStart to finish · 15 stages, 13 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 1,000 ft gate: centreline 1.8° off, against a 1° limit.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,984 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 465 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Lyon Saint-Exupéry Airport, the RJ85 aircraft began its journey on runway 35L, accelerating down the 1,469-meter takeoff distance, which represented 37% of the available runway. At a liftoff speed of 140 knots, the aircraft lifted off into the warm local weather, with a temperature of 27°C and a negligible headwind of 3 knots. The aircraft then transitioned into a steady climb, starting approximately 1 mile southeast of Pusignan, France, and continued to ascend to a cruising altitude of 29,975 feet above sea level, a gain of 28,232 feet in just 23 minutes, covering a distance of 134 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise phase began overhead Hauteville, Switzerland, and lasted for 15 minutes, during which the aircraft covered 111 nautical miles. Following this, the aircraft initiated its descent, starting 3 miles southwest of Langenargen, Germany, and gradually descended to 2,717 feet above sea level, a decrease of 26,959 feet in 23 minutes, covering a distance of 131 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final approach to runway 26L at Munich Airport, aligning itself with the runway from the east, at a heading of 272.0°, 4 nautical miles from the threshold and 1,232 feet above ground level.
The RJ85 landed smoothly on runway 26L, with a touchdown speed of 108 knots and a touchdown rate of -139 feet per minute. The touchdown point was 47 meters beyond the touchdown zone, and the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 4.1 meters from the centerline. The total landing distance was 1,110 meters, representing 28% of the available runway. Following a successful landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, covering a distance of 3 nautical miles in 10 minutes. The total flight distance was 388 nautical miles, with a total flight time of 1 hour and 21 minutes, and the aircraft consumed 2,573 kilograms of fuel.
The aircraft touched down on runway 26L at EDDM Munich Airport with a smooth touchdown rate of -139 fpm, indicating a well-executed flare. The touchdown speed of 108 kt was within the acceptable range, and the threshold speed of 120 kt was also satisfactory. The touchdown point was 47 m beyond the touchdown zone, which is a relatively minor deviation. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 4.1 m from the centreline, but this did not appear to have any significant impact on the subsequent rollout.
The aircraft's approach quality was good, with a stable and controlled descent from 1,232 ft agl at 4 nm from the runway. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 22 °C and a light wind of 4 kt at 320 °, were conducive to a smooth landing. The crosswind component of 3 kt and headwind component of 2 kt were minimal, allowing the pilot to maintain a stable approach path. The runway length of 3,987 m provided a comfortable margin for the landing, with the total landing distance of 1,110 m accounting for only 28% of the available runway.
The rollout phase was characterized by very good alignment, with the aircraft staying close to the centreline. This suggests that the pilot maintained control of the aircraft during the rollout, despite the slight misalignment at touchdown. Overall, the landing was executed well, with a score of 99.5% indicating a high level of proficiency. The pilot's ability to manage the approach, touchdown, and rollout phases resulted in a safe and efficient landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values